HOLOGRAPHIC ENTROPY AND THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF OBJECTIVITY: a critical–propositional analysis of Daisuke Sato's article in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of Daisuke Sato’s Holographic Entropy Growth in Expanding Universe: Thermodynamic Consistency and Screen Interpretation in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO), developed by Vidamor Cabannas and Denivaldo Silva. The study examines Sato’s treatment of holographic entropy, thermodynamic consistency, gravitational thermodynamics, and the interpretation of holographic screens as a possible operational bridge to central categories of TO. The analysis emphasizes the strong dialogue between Sato’s cosmological framework and the modal principles of TO, especially regarding the necessity of boundaries, the informational constitution of physical reality, the relation between horizon and cosmic memory, and the idea that the universe requires a substance transcendent to its quantum. Within TO, this transcendent element is understood as knowledge or information produced in atomic relations and equivalent to atomic radiation. The article also identifies important points of tension between Sato’s physical-computational approach and TO’s broader modal ontology, particularly concerning the primitive mathematical status of Nothingness, the logical role of infinity, the ontological function of observation, and the distinction between physical horizon and modal boundary. It further articulates Sato’s proposal with TO’s phenomenic elements, Inducer Effects, cosmogonic theorem, and cosmological Eras. This analytical text received analytical support from ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Daisuke Sato; holographic entropy; holographic screen; gravitational thermodynamics; cosmology; modal ontology; boundary; cosmic memory; transcendent information; atomic radiation; Inducer Effects; cosmogonic theorem; cosmological Eras; informational cosmology; Denivaldo Silva