Comparison of root resorption severity after fixed and invisible orthodontic treatment in patients with four first premolar extractions: A retrospective study

Root resorption is a common and unavoidable complication of orthodontic treatment, with limited research on its pattern in extraction cases using clear aligners. This study compared the severity of root resorption between fixed appliances and clear aligners in patients who underwent 4 first premolar extractions. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 28 patients with Angle Class I and II malocclusion treated with fixed appliances (n = 14) or clear aligners (n = 14) from 2019 to 2025. The mean treatment duration was 37.93 ± 13.65 months. Root resorption was assessed for both groups involving 488 teeth for right and left first molar and anterior teeth until canine for both arches excluding first and second premolar using the relative root-to-crown ratio on panoramic radiographs and tooth movement was measured using cephalometric superimposition. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to evaluate group differences. The proportion of teeth with no root resorption was significantly higher in the clear aligner group (52.67%, 236 teeth; χ2 = 11.253, P = .010) compared fixed appliance group (42.86%, 192 teeth). For upper anterior teeth, the fixed appliance group had a notably higher rate of moderate-to-severe resorption (40.91%) compared to the clear aligner group (17.14%; χ2 = 33.651, P < .001). For upper first molars and lower first molars, the clear aligner group also showed higher proportions of teeth without resorption (upper first molars: 28 vs 20 teeth, χ2 = 11.333, P = .010; lower first molars: 36 vs 16 teeth, χ2 = 15.692, P = .001). In terms of tooth movement, only the vertical (Y-axis) movement of lower anterior teeth differed significantly between groups: 0.8814 ± 1.01909 mm (fixed appliances, 95% CI: 0.06107-1.82393) versus 1.1314 ± 0.70874 mm (clear aligners, 95% CI: 0.47595-1.78690; P = .017), with no significant differences in other directions (all P > .05). Fixed appliances may increase the risk of moderate-to-severe root resorption in anterior teeth due to continuous heavy forces, while clear aligners reduce severe resorption but require caution during vertical movements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000048605
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of root resorption severity after fixed and invisible orthodontic treatment in patients with four first premolar extractions: A retrospective study

D Li, Norma Ab Rahman, Chen Luo, Su Li et al.
Medicine
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Comparison of root resorption severity after fixed and invisible orthodontic treatment in patients with four first premolar extractions: A retrospective study

D Li, Norma Ab Rahman, Chen Luo, Su Li, Xu Zhang, Zhe Tang, Qichao Kang, Jingwen Wang
article en

Abstract

Root resorption is a common and unavoidable complication of orthodontic treatment, with limited research on its pattern in extraction cases using clear aligners. This study compared the severity of root resorption between fixed appliances and clear aligners in patients who underwent 4 first premolar extractions. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 28 patients with Angle Class I and II malocclusion treated with fixed appliances (n = 14) or clear aligners (n = 14) from 2019 to 2025. The mean treatment duration was 37.93 ± 13.65 months. Root resorption was assessed for both groups involving 488 teeth for right and left first molar and anterior teeth until canine for both arches excluding first and second premolar using the relative root-to-crown ratio on panoramic radiographs and tooth movement was measured using cephalometric superimposition. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to evaluate group differences. The proportion of teeth with no root resorption was significantly higher in the clear aligner group (52.67%, 236 teeth; χ2 = 11.253, P = .010) compared fixed appliance group (42.86%, 192 teeth). For upper anterior teeth, the fixed appliance group had a notably higher rate of moderate-to-severe resorption (40.91%) compared to the clear aligner group (17.14%; χ2 = 33.651, P < .001). For upper first molars and lower first molars, the clear aligner group also showed higher proportions of teeth without resorption (upper first molars: 28 vs 20 teeth, χ2 = 11.333, P = .010; lower first molars: 36 vs 16 teeth, χ2 = 15.692, P = .001). In terms of tooth movement, only the vertical (Y-axis) movement of lower anterior teeth differed significantly between groups: 0.8814 ± 1.01909 mm (fixed appliances, 95% CI: 0.06107-1.82393) versus 1.1314 ± 0.70874 mm (clear aligners, 95% CI: 0.47595-1.78690; P = .017), with no significant differences in other directions (all P > .05). Fixed appliances may increase the risk of moderate-to-severe root resorption in anterior teeth due to continuous heavy forces, while clear aligners reduce severe resorption but require caution during vertical movements.

MedicineVol. 105(18)
Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY), Changzhi Medical College (CN), Tianjin First Center Hospital (CN), Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY), Shanghai Stomatological Hospital (CN), Beijing Luhe Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University (CN), Beijing Xuanwu Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital (CN), Stomatology Hospital (CN), Tianjin Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.