Psychosocial implications, acceptability and ethics of screening for paediatric type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and mixed methods evidence synthesis

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Paediatric population screening for type 1 diabetes is emerging internationally. It is critically important to understand the acceptability of screening to inform these initiatives. In this systematic review, we aimed to assess the psychosocial impact, acceptability and ethics of screening for paediatric type 1 diabetes. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, APA PsycInfo, ASSIA, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, and included quantitative, mixed methods and qualitative articles until 25 November 2025. We assessed the emotional, cognitive and behavioural implications, acceptability or ethics of type 1 diabetes early detection for parents and/or children. We used the mixed methods appraisal tool and critical appraisal skills checklists for quality assessment. We performed a mixed methods evidence synthesis, identifying key themes from qualitative data and merging with quantitative data to generate meta-inferences. RESULTS: Seventy articles (12 qualitative, 57 quantitative and one mixed methods) involving 62,244 parents and 6363 children aged <18 years were included. Seven articles (10.0%) met all quality criteria (high quality), 43 (61.4%) met 60-80% of criteria (moderate quality) and 20 (28.6%) met <50% of criteria (low quality). We generated five themes and 19 sub-themes. Identification of early-stage type 1 diabetes generated anxiety, which waned over time but could recur. Overall, parents who opted into an early detection research programme valued knowing their child's risk and perceived benefits to outweigh harms, although paediatric blood sampling was considered challenging. Research ethics of screening centred on joint decision making according to the child's age, right to results disclosure and importance of data integrity. We synthesised a large pool of heterogenous studies, reflecting how understanding of early disease has evolved, but likely influencing the acceptability of screening. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: This, the most comprehensive review of the literature to date, demonstrates that despite the emotional, cognitive and behavioural implications, thus far, screening and early detection of paediatric type 1 diabetes appears to be acceptable to parents/guardians who take part but critical evidence gaps remain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42024566937 FUNDING: EDENT1FI (grant no. 101132379).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetologia
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-026-06717-2
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychosocial implications, acceptability and ethics of screening for paediatric type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and mixed methods evidence synthesis

G. Agiostratidou, F. Reschke, B Berka, A. Koralova et al.
Diabetologia
Diabetes Management and Research
article

Psychosocial implications, acceptability and ethics of screening for paediatric type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and mixed methods evidence synthesis

G. Agiostratidou, F. Reschke, B Berka, A. Koralova, Gaia Perego, Antonio Catarinella, Francesca Gatti, B. Torbeyns, T Berge, H. Hyöty, Jessica L. Dunne, B. Petersen, G. Gemulla, P. Jarosz-Chobot, R E Berner, S. Del Prato, KATHARINE BARNARD, O. Cinek, KE Hood, K. Fogh, Marie Amoroso, O. Cohen, Carmen Hurtado del Pozo, Mark Peakman, Matthew J. Randell, V. Neuman, O Kordonouri, Francesca Milano, Valentina Elisabetta Di Mattei, E. Latres, K. Casteels, Jurgen Vercauteren, Lavinia Bellamore Dettori, G. Sebastiani, P. Gillard, Rocco Sheldon, S. Hummel, P. Achenbach, F. Haupt, C. Winkler, R. Bergholdt, Felicity K Boardman, Parth Narendran, Lauren M Quinn, Olga Boiko, David Stanley, Muhammad Abid, Chantal Mathieu, Renuka P Dias, Ezio Bonifacio, Emanuele Bosi, Ian Litchfield, Karin Lange, Lut Overbergh, Sheila M Greenfield, Anette-Gabriele Ziegler, J. Jackson, R. Ribeiro, D. Darrock, J. Townson, J. E. Laiho, T. Pieber, V. Lampasona, H. Tewson, S. Nagallas, S. Moitzi, J. Hedrick, E. Niemoeller, A. Szypowska, M. Baccara-Dinet, F. Dotta, S. Chen, D. Agardh, M. I. Buompensiere, T. Tree, R. Playle, A. Hommel, R Coelho, J. Mader, R. Besser, L. Piemonti, B. van der Schueren, Z. Sumnik, N. Zubizarreta, J. F. Raposo, F. Pociot, A. Loff, J. H. Klaebel, C. Dayan, J. Van Rampelbergh, K. Collins, J. Antvorskov, K. Karczewski
article en

Abstract

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Paediatric population screening for type 1 diabetes is emerging internationally. It is critically important to understand the acceptability of screening to inform these initiatives. In this systematic review, we aimed to assess the psychosocial impact, acceptability and ethics of screening for paediatric type 1 diabetes. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, APA PsycInfo, ASSIA, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, and included quantitative, mixed methods and qualitative articles until 25 November 2025. We assessed the emotional, cognitive and behavioural implications, acceptability or ethics of type 1 diabetes early detection for parents and/or children. We used the mixed methods appraisal tool and critical appraisal skills checklists for quality assessment. We performed a mixed methods evidence synthesis, identifying key themes from qualitative data and merging with quantitative data to generate meta-inferences. RESULTS: Seventy articles (12 qualitative, 57 quantitative and one mixed methods) involving 62,244 parents and 6363 children aged <18 years were included. Seven articles (10.0%) met all quality criteria (high quality), 43 (61.4%) met 60-80% of criteria (moderate quality) and 20 (28.6%) met <50% of criteria (low quality). We generated five themes and 19 sub-themes. Identification of early-stage type 1 diabetes generated anxiety, which waned over time but could recur. Overall, parents who opted into an early detection research programme valued knowing their child's risk and perceived benefits to outweigh harms, although paediatric blood sampling was considered challenging. Research ethics of screening centred on joint decision making according to the child's age, right to results disclosure and importance of data integrity. We synthesised a large pool of heterogenous studies, reflecting how understanding of early disease has evolved, but likely influencing the acceptability of screening. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: This, the most comprehensive review of the literature to date, demonstrates that despite the emotional, cognitive and behavioural implications, thus far, screening and early detection of paediatric type 1 diabetes appears to be acceptable to parents/guardians who take part but critical evidence gaps remain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42024566937 FUNDING: EDENT1FI (grant no. 101132379).

Diabetologia
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT), Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB), TUM Klinikum (DE), University College Birmingham (GB), Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE), University of Warwick (GB), Breakthrough (US), Sanofi (United States) (US), Inflammation Research Foundation (US), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele (IT), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT), Technische Universität Dresden (DE), University of Birmingham (GB), KU Leuven (BE)
Innovative Health Initiative
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Diabetes Management and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.