Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing a Remote Monitoring Model of Care for Stable Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: Qualitative Study

Background: Close follow-up of stable patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) presents a financial burden and inconvenience to patients. A remote monitoring patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)-based model of care (PROMise) was designed to reduce the frequency of in-person consultations for stable patients with axSpA. However, little is known about the facilitators and barriers of implementing a remote monitoring PROMise. Objective: This study aims to understand the facilitators and barriers, as well as the mitigation strategies to implementing a PROMise in the Singapore context. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study involving in-depth interviews with 19 patients with axSpA (78.9% (15) male, mean age 39.4, SD 11.7 years) and 13 health care professionals (HCPs) (23.1%, 3 male; mean age 37.9, SD 7.2 years) in a tertiary hospital in Singapore until data saturation was reached. Participants were purposively recruited based on sex, age, and ethnicity. Patients were additionally recruited based on the number of years since diagnosed with axSpA, while HCPs were recruited based on seniority and their role in the care of patients with axSpA. Interviews were transcribed, deductively analyzed, and mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) framework to identify facilitators and barriers from both the patients' and HCPs' perspectives. The CFIR-Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) match tool was used to produce implementation strategies to overcome the CFIR barriers identified. Results: All five domains of the CFIR framework were elicited. Facilitators included (1) reduced inconvenience and costs for patients and reduced patient load in the clinic, (2) need for PROMise, (3) similarity to current workflows, and (4) suitable patient selection. Barriers included concerns for (1) financial sustainability of PROMise, (2) cultural conditions, (3) patient safety, and (4) increased workload for HCPs. In total, 35 ERIC strategies were matched to the corresponding CFIR barriers. Conclusions: We identified ERIC strategies that will facilitate the implementation of the PROMise model. In particular, focus should be placed on developing an implementation blueprint and obtaining continuous feedback from affected patients with axSpA and HCPs involved in the care of the affected patients. These implementation strategies cross-cut the CFIR barriers identified and thus may overcome the barriers to implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/82480
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing a Remote Monitoring Model of Care for Stable Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: Qualitative Study

Melissa Hock, Humairah Zainal, Truls Østbye, Julian Thumboo et al.
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing a Remote Monitoring Model of Care for Stable Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: Qualitative Study

Melissa Hock, Humairah Zainal, Truls Østbye, Julian Thumboo, Charmaine Tze May Wang, Hendra Goh, Zhonghui Xiong, Ying-Ying Leung, Xin Ru Chew, Charmaine Wai Yan Sum, Lian Leng Low, Ka-Hao Zee, Sungwon Yoon, Warren Fong, Yu Heng Kwan
article en

Abstract

Background: Close follow-up of stable patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) presents a financial burden and inconvenience to patients. A remote monitoring patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)-based model of care (PROMise) was designed to reduce the frequency of in-person consultations for stable patients with axSpA. However, little is known about the facilitators and barriers of implementing a remote monitoring PROMise. Objective: This study aims to understand the facilitators and barriers, as well as the mitigation strategies to implementing a PROMise in the Singapore context. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study involving in-depth interviews with 19 patients with axSpA (78.9% (15) male, mean age 39.4, SD 11.7 years) and 13 health care professionals (HCPs) (23.1%, 3 male; mean age 37.9, SD 7.2 years) in a tertiary hospital in Singapore until data saturation was reached. Participants were purposively recruited based on sex, age, and ethnicity. Patients were additionally recruited based on the number of years since diagnosed with axSpA, while HCPs were recruited based on seniority and their role in the care of patients with axSpA. Interviews were transcribed, deductively analyzed, and mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) framework to identify facilitators and barriers from both the patients' and HCPs' perspectives. The CFIR-Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) match tool was used to produce implementation strategies to overcome the CFIR barriers identified. Results: All five domains of the CFIR framework were elicited. Facilitators included (1) reduced inconvenience and costs for patients and reduced patient load in the clinic, (2) need for PROMise, (3) similarity to current workflows, and (4) suitable patient selection. Barriers included concerns for (1) financial sustainability of PROMise, (2) cultural conditions, (3) patient safety, and (4) increased workload for HCPs. In total, 35 ERIC strategies were matched to the corresponding CFIR barriers. Conclusions: We identified ERIC strategies that will facilitate the implementation of the PROMise model. In particular, focus should be placed on developing an implementation blueprint and obtaining continuous feedback from affected patients with axSpA and HCPs involved in the care of the affected patients. These implementation strategies cross-cut the CFIR barriers identified and thus may overcome the barriers to implementation.

Journal of Medical Internet ResearchVol. 28
SingHealth (SG), National University of Singapore (SG), Duke University (US), Nanyang Technological University (SG), Singapore General Hospital (SG), Duke-NUS Medical School (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.