A potential mutation-defined POLE/MMR/TP53 group classifications to stratify BRCA wild type epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND: TCGA molecular classification has prognostic value in endometrial cancer, but its application in epithelial ovarian cancer is not clear. METHODS: We investigated the somatic mutations of POLE, MMR (MLH1, MLH3, MSH2, MSH3, MSH6, PMS1, PMS2) and TP53, in 181 BRCA wild type EOC patients. RESULTS: The patterns were different in histology [ serous vs. endometrioid vs. clear cell (POLEmut: 0% vs. 2.8% vs. 0%, MMRmut: 6.4% vs. 22.2% vs. 11.9%, TP53mut: 75.7% vs. 16.7% vs. 4.5%, NSMP: 17.9% vs. 58.3% vs. 83.6%, p < 0.001)]; FIGO stage [early vs. advanced (POLEmut: 1.4% vs. 0%, MMRmut: 11.3% vs. 11.8%, TP53mut: 9.8% vs. 55.5%, NSMP: 77.5% vs. 32.7%, p < 0.001)]; tumor grade [low vs. high (POLEmut: 3.8% vs. 0%, MMRmut: 19.2% vs. 10.3%, TP53mut: 11.5% vs. 41.9%, NSMP: 65.5% vs. 47.8%, p = 0.002)]; tumor recurrence [no vs. yes (POLEmut: 1.4% vs. 0%, MMRmut: 11.3% vs. 11.9%, TP53mut: 21.1% vs. 47.7%, NSMP: 66.2% vs. 40.4%, p = 0.002)] and tumor-related death [no vs. yes (POLEmut: 1.0% vs. 0%, MMRmut: 9.2% vs. 14.5%, TP53mut: 25.5% vs. 51.8%, NSMP: 64.3% vs. 33.7%, p < 0.001)]. There was difference in median disease-free survival [months (POLEmut: not reached, MMRmut: 12.5, TP53mut: 8.5, NSMP: 36.5; p = 0.002)] and overall survival [months (POLEmut: not reached, MMRmut: 41, TP53mut: 47, NSMP: not reached; p = 0.008)]. In multivariate regression analysis, R0 resection (HR: 0.54 [0.32-0.90], p < 0.001) was important prognostic factor of tumor recurrence. Platinum partial sensitive response (HR: 9.27 [3.73-23.01], p < 0.001) and platinum resistant response (HR: 26.29 [11.75-58.82], p < 0.001) were important prognostic factors of tumor-related death. CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of mutation-defined POLE/MMR/TP53 group classifications varied in histological subtypes, FIGO stage and clinical outcomes in BRCA wild type EOC. BRCA wild type EOC patients with POLEmut or NSMP had favorable survival than those with MMRmut or TP53mut. The panel could be a potential marker for EOC patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Ovarian Research
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-026-02123-9
Primary Topic
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A potential mutation-defined POLE/MMR/TP53 group classifications to stratify BRCA wild type epithelial ovarian cancer

Yi‐Jou Tai, Ying‐Cheng Chiang, Yuehua Chen, Heng‐Cheng Hsu et al.
Journal of Ovarian Research
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
article

A potential mutation-defined POLE/MMR/TP53 group classifications to stratify BRCA wild type epithelial ovarian cancer

Yi‐Jou Tai, Ying‐Cheng Chiang, Yuehua Chen, Heng‐Cheng Hsu, Po-Han Lin, Kuan-Ting Kuo
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: TCGA molecular classification has prognostic value in endometrial cancer, but its application in epithelial ovarian cancer is not clear. METHODS: We investigated the somatic mutations of POLE, MMR (MLH1, MLH3, MSH2, MSH3, MSH6, PMS1, PMS2) and TP53, in 181 BRCA wild type EOC patients. RESULTS: The patterns were different in histology [ serous vs. endometrioid vs. clear cell (POLEmut: 0% vs. 2.8% vs. 0%, MMRmut: 6.4% vs. 22.2% vs. 11.9%, TP53mut: 75.7% vs. 16.7% vs. 4.5%, NSMP: 17.9% vs. 58.3% vs. 83.6%, p < 0.001)]; FIGO stage [early vs. advanced (POLEmut: 1.4% vs. 0%, MMRmut: 11.3% vs. 11.8%, TP53mut: 9.8% vs. 55.5%, NSMP: 77.5% vs. 32.7%, p < 0.001)]; tumor grade [low vs. high (POLEmut: 3.8% vs. 0%, MMRmut: 19.2% vs. 10.3%, TP53mut: 11.5% vs. 41.9%, NSMP: 65.5% vs. 47.8%, p = 0.002)]; tumor recurrence [no vs. yes (POLEmut: 1.4% vs. 0%, MMRmut: 11.3% vs. 11.9%, TP53mut: 21.1% vs. 47.7%, NSMP: 66.2% vs. 40.4%, p = 0.002)] and tumor-related death [no vs. yes (POLEmut: 1.0% vs. 0%, MMRmut: 9.2% vs. 14.5%, TP53mut: 25.5% vs. 51.8%, NSMP: 64.3% vs. 33.7%, p < 0.001)]. There was difference in median disease-free survival [months (POLEmut: not reached, MMRmut: 12.5, TP53mut: 8.5, NSMP: 36.5; p = 0.002)] and overall survival [months (POLEmut: not reached, MMRmut: 41, TP53mut: 47, NSMP: not reached; p = 0.008)]. In multivariate regression analysis, R0 resection (HR: 0.54 [0.32-0.90], p < 0.001) was important prognostic factor of tumor recurrence. Platinum partial sensitive response (HR: 9.27 [3.73-23.01], p < 0.001) and platinum resistant response (HR: 26.29 [11.75-58.82], p < 0.001) were important prognostic factors of tumor-related death. CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of mutation-defined POLE/MMR/TP53 group classifications varied in histological subtypes, FIGO stage and clinical outcomes in BRCA wild type EOC. BRCA wild type EOC patients with POLEmut or NSMP had favorable survival than those with MMRmut or TP53mut. The panel could be a potential marker for EOC patients.

Journal of Ovarian Research
National Taiwan University (TW), National Taiwan University Hospital (TW), National Yunlin University of Science and Technology (TW)
National Taiwan University Hospital
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.