Impact resetting of the U-Pb, Pb-Pb, and Rb-Sr chronometers in the 4.3 Gyr-old lunar granitoids

Understanding when lunar granitoids formed remains a long-standing challenge hampering efforts to place these rock types into the wider context of the geological evolution of the Moon. In particular, it is poorly understood what their relationship is to KREEP-rich mafic lithologies such as alkali gabbronorites that have been linked to the generation of felsic melts through processes such as crustal underplating. Here we report in situ Rb-Sr, U-Pb, and Pb isotope systematics for lunar granitoid and alkali gabbronorite clasts from a range of Apollo landing sites. Our data indicate that the dates derived from the Rb-Sr, U-Pb, and Pb isotope systematics recorded by plagioclase, K-feldspar, Ca-phosphates and glass most likely reflect impact resetting events rather than initial crystallisation ages. Granitoid and alkali gabbronorite samples 67975,9011, 14303,330, 72275,520, and 73255,9083 record dates consistent with the Imbrium impact event at 3.92 Ga, whereas samples 14305,111, 73235,73, and 14305,102 record modification by younger impacts at ~3.5 to ~3.6 Ga. Currently, zircon U-Pb isotope dates provide the most robust constraints on the formation ages of Apollo sampled granitoids. The majority of zircon dates are significantly older than those calculated from crater counting for lunar silicic domes (mostly between ca. 4 to 3.6 Ga). Consequently, it is not evident that mechanisms for generating large volumes of evolved melt by processes such as crustal underplating of mafic lithologies are needed. Formation within granophyre layers in magmatic layered intrusions or differentiated impact melt sheets cannot be ruled out.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Published
2026-04-02
Primary Topic
Planetary Science and Exploration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact resetting of the U-Pb, Pb-Pb, and Rb-Sr chronometers in the 4.3 Gyr-old lunar granitoids

D.A. Neave, R. Tartèse, K. H. Joy, M. E.; id_orcid 0000-0002-2698-8622 Hartley et al.
Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Planetary Science and Exploration
article

Impact resetting of the U-Pb, Pb-Pb, and Rb-Sr chronometers in the 4.3 Gyr-old lunar granitoids

D.A. Neave, R. Tartèse, K. H. Joy, M. E.; id_orcid 0000-0002-2698-8622 Hartley, F.; id_orcid 0000-0001-9616-5413 Boschetty, M. J. Whitehouse, J. F.; id_orcid 0000-0002-1804-420X Snape, J. F. Pernet-Fisher
article en

Abstract

Understanding when lunar granitoids formed remains a long-standing challenge hampering efforts to place these rock types into the wider context of the geological evolution of the Moon. In particular, it is poorly understood what their relationship is to KREEP-rich mafic lithologies such as alkali gabbronorites that have been linked to the generation of felsic melts through processes such as crustal underplating. Here we report in situ Rb-Sr, U-Pb, and Pb isotope systematics for lunar granitoid and alkali gabbronorite clasts from a range of Apollo landing sites. Our data indicate that the dates derived from the Rb-Sr, U-Pb, and Pb isotope systematics recorded by plagioclase, K-feldspar, Ca-phosphates and glass most likely reflect impact resetting events rather than initial crystallisation ages. Granitoid and alkali gabbronorite samples 67975,9011, 14303,330, 72275,520, and 73255,9083 record dates consistent with the Imbrium impact event at 3.92 Ga, whereas samples 14305,111, 73235,73, and 14305,102 record modification by younger impacts at ~3.5 to ~3.6 Ga. Currently, zircon U-Pb isotope dates provide the most robust constraints on the formation ages of Apollo sampled granitoids. The majority of zircon dates are significantly older than those calculated from crater counting for lunar silicic domes (mostly between ca. 4 to 3.6 Ga). Consequently, it is not evident that mechanisms for generating large volumes of evolved melt by processes such as crustal underplating of mafic lithologies are needed. Formation within granophyre layers in magmatic layered intrusions or differentiated impact melt sheets cannot be ruled out.

Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Swedish Museum of Natural History (SE), Environmental Earth Sciences (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Planetary Science and Exploration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.