Protecting Children from Coercive Control: A Case for Denying Return Under the Hague Abduction Convention

Domestic abuse definitions have broadened from physical violence to include coercive control, a pattern of behavior that includes threats, stalking, psychological abuse, economic abuse, sexual coercion, isolation and denying autonomy. This shift parallels rising international parental child abduction cases, especially mothers and children escaping abuse. The 1980 Hague Convention on international child abduction mandates rapid cross-border child return yet allows exceptions when return creates grave harm or intolerable conditions for the child. We argue courts should refuse return orders upon finding evidence of coercive control, since such abusive behavior fundamentally endangers children's psychological and physical wellbeing and exposes them to intolerable situations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Edge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University)
Published
2026-04-20
Primary Topic
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Protecting Children from Coercive Control: A Case for Denying Return Under the Hague Abduction Convention

Jeffrey L.Edleson, EMMA; id_orcid 0000-0001-7341-3365 KATZ
Edge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University)
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
article

Protecting Children from Coercive Control: A Case for Denying Return Under the Hague Abduction Convention

Jeffrey L.Edleson, EMMA; id_orcid 0000-0001-7341-3365 KATZ
article en

Abstract

Domestic abuse definitions have broadened from physical violence to include coercive control, a pattern of behavior that includes threats, stalking, psychological abuse, economic abuse, sexual coercion, isolation and denying autonomy. This shift parallels rising international parental child abduction cases, especially mothers and children escaping abuse. The 1980 Hague Convention on international child abduction mandates rapid cross-border child return yet allows exceptions when return creates grave harm or intolerable conditions for the child. We argue courts should refuse return orders upon finding evidence of coercive control, since such abusive behavior fundamentally endangers children's psychological and physical wellbeing and exposes them to intolerable situations.

Edge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University)
Institute of Geography of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.