Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of medication safety recommendations: focus groups with stakeholders

INTRODUCTION: Multiple medication safety recommendations to reduce preventable medication-related hospitalisations have been introduced in the Netherlands. Still, these hospitalisations remain prevalent. This might be due to suboptimal implementation in clinical practice. Therefore, more insight is needed into barriers and facilitators for the implementation of these medication safety recommendations across healthcare sectors. AIM: This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators for implementing medication safety recommendations across healthcare sectors from the perspective of various stakeholders. METHOD: A selection of 17 Dutch medication safety recommendations targeting medications responsible for a large proportion of medication-related hospitalisations was evaluated in focus groups to identify barriers and facilitators to their implementation. These included recommendations for: reducing fall risk in elderly; initiating prophylactic medication; monitoring patients at risk of electrolyte disorders; clarifying responsibilities for patient care; informing patients about alarm symptoms; and prescribing antithrombotics on strict indication. Stakeholders were selected through purposive sampling based on their profession and healthcare sector. Transcripts of audio-recordings were analysed inductively, after which implementation factors were categorised using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. RESULTS: Thirty stakeholders were divided into five focus groups. These included community pharmacists (n = 9), general practitioners (n = 4), hospital pharmacists (n = 3), representatives from healthcare knowledge organisations (n = 3), patient representatives (n = 2), medical specialists (n = 2), nurses (n = 2), and other stakeholders (n = 5). Forty-nine barriers and facilitators were identified. Key themes were lack of specified responsibilities, limited information exchange, local collaboration and protocol adherence. Recommendations with a lower level of implementation often required collaboration with multiple healthcare providers, whereas recommendations with a higher level of implementation were frequently supported by clinical decision support systems. CONCLUSION: A broad range of barriers and facilitators to the implementation of medication safety recommendations was identified. Overall, the findings highlight the need for recommendations with specified responsibilities, improved information exchange, strengthened local collaboration, and increased protocol adherence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-026-02141-z
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of medication safety recommendations: focus groups with stakeholders

Marcia Vervloet, Mette Heringa, Bart J F van de Bemt, Marloes Dankers et al.
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
article

Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of medication safety recommendations: focus groups with stakeholders

Marcia Vervloet, Mette Heringa, Bart J F van de Bemt, Marloes Dankers, L Van Dijk, Victor J B Huiskes, Lise van Tholen, Mirthe A M Oude Lansink
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Multiple medication safety recommendations to reduce preventable medication-related hospitalisations have been introduced in the Netherlands. Still, these hospitalisations remain prevalent. This might be due to suboptimal implementation in clinical practice. Therefore, more insight is needed into barriers and facilitators for the implementation of these medication safety recommendations across healthcare sectors. AIM: This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators for implementing medication safety recommendations across healthcare sectors from the perspective of various stakeholders. METHOD: A selection of 17 Dutch medication safety recommendations targeting medications responsible for a large proportion of medication-related hospitalisations was evaluated in focus groups to identify barriers and facilitators to their implementation. These included recommendations for: reducing fall risk in elderly; initiating prophylactic medication; monitoring patients at risk of electrolyte disorders; clarifying responsibilities for patient care; informing patients about alarm symptoms; and prescribing antithrombotics on strict indication. Stakeholders were selected through purposive sampling based on their profession and healthcare sector. Transcripts of audio-recordings were analysed inductively, after which implementation factors were categorised using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. RESULTS: Thirty stakeholders were divided into five focus groups. These included community pharmacists (n = 9), general practitioners (n = 4), hospital pharmacists (n = 3), representatives from healthcare knowledge organisations (n = 3), patient representatives (n = 2), medical specialists (n = 2), nurses (n = 2), and other stakeholders (n = 5). Forty-nine barriers and facilitators were identified. Key themes were lack of specified responsibilities, limited information exchange, local collaboration and protocol adherence. Recommendations with a lower level of implementation often required collaboration with multiple healthcare providers, whereas recommendations with a higher level of implementation were frequently supported by clinical decision support systems. CONCLUSION: A broad range of barriers and facilitators to the implementation of medication safety recommendations was identified. Overall, the findings highlight the need for recommendations with specified responsibilities, improved information exchange, strengthened local collaboration, and increased protocol adherence.

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), University of Groningen (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Instituut voor Verantwoord Medicijngebruik (NL), Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NL), Sint Maartenskliniek (NL), Sint Maartenskliniek (NL), SIR Institute for Pharmacy Practice and Policy (NL)
ZonMw
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.