Changes in Academic Standardized Testing After Pediatric Intensive Care

Importance: Children who survive critical illness commonly experience long-term morbidities. Little is known about the association of critical illness with cognitive health due to lack of preillness and postillness assessments and an adequate comparison population. Objective: To use school-based testing to evaluate cognitive health outcomes among children treated in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) compared with non-PICU-exposed control students. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective case-control study used statewide academic data and propensity score matching of 1088 patients admitted to the only PICU in Arkansas from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2018, as well as controls matched on sociodemographic and pre-PICU admission academic factors. Statistical analysis was performed from March 2024 to September 2025. Exposure: PICU admission. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were (1) return to standardized testing, assessed using multivariable logistic regression to assess the odds of having a standardized test within 2 years after PICU admission compared with controls, and (2) change in pre-PICU to post-PICU test scores for PICU patients compared with propensity-matched control students, assessed using multivariable linear regression. Results: In this case-control study of 1088 school-aged patients (mean [SD] age, 12.1 [1.6] years; 566 girls [52.0%]), fewer PICU patients than controls had test scores after admission for math (80.6% [874 of 1085] vs 86.5% [938 of 1085]; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.64 [95% CI, 0.51-0.81]) and reading (81.1% [877 of 1081] vs 87.1% [941 of 1081]; AOR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.51-0.82]). PICU patients' preadmission z scores were below average in math (z = -0.23 [95% CI, -0.29 to -0.16]) and reading (z = -0.22 [95% CI, -0.29 to -0.15]) compared with Arkansas students in the same grade and year. In adjusted pre-post analyses, PICU patients had a small but significant decrease in reading relative to controls (-0.07 [95% CI, -0.14 to -0.01]). The change in math score was not statistically significant (-0.06 [95% CI, -0.13 to 0.003]). Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that PICU patients were less likely to take standardized tests after discharge and that those who did had greater decreases in reading scores relative to matched controls. Future studies should identify risk factors for nonreturn to testing and score decrease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Network Open
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.9948
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Changes in Academic Standardized Testing After Pediatric Intensive Care

Peter M. Mourani, Chayla Rutledge Slaton, Katherine Irby, Sarah McKenzie et al.
JAMA Network Open
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Changes in Academic Standardized Testing After Pediatric Intensive Care

Peter M. Mourani, Chayla Rutledge Slaton, Katherine Irby, Sarah McKenzie, Jill J. Fussell, Clare C. Brown, Aline B. Maddux, Erin F. Carlton, Claire C. Foster, Melanie Boyd
article en

Abstract

Importance: Children who survive critical illness commonly experience long-term morbidities. Little is known about the association of critical illness with cognitive health due to lack of preillness and postillness assessments and an adequate comparison population. Objective: To use school-based testing to evaluate cognitive health outcomes among children treated in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) compared with non-PICU-exposed control students. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective case-control study used statewide academic data and propensity score matching of 1088 patients admitted to the only PICU in Arkansas from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2018, as well as controls matched on sociodemographic and pre-PICU admission academic factors. Statistical analysis was performed from March 2024 to September 2025. Exposure: PICU admission. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were (1) return to standardized testing, assessed using multivariable logistic regression to assess the odds of having a standardized test within 2 years after PICU admission compared with controls, and (2) change in pre-PICU to post-PICU test scores for PICU patients compared with propensity-matched control students, assessed using multivariable linear regression. Results: In this case-control study of 1088 school-aged patients (mean [SD] age, 12.1 [1.6] years; 566 girls [52.0%]), fewer PICU patients than controls had test scores after admission for math (80.6% [874 of 1085] vs 86.5% [938 of 1085]; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.64 [95% CI, 0.51-0.81]) and reading (81.1% [877 of 1081] vs 87.1% [941 of 1081]; AOR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.51-0.82]). PICU patients' preadmission z scores were below average in math (z = -0.23 [95% CI, -0.29 to -0.16]) and reading (z = -0.22 [95% CI, -0.29 to -0.15]) compared with Arkansas students in the same grade and year. In adjusted pre-post analyses, PICU patients had a small but significant decrease in reading relative to controls (-0.07 [95% CI, -0.14 to -0.01]). The change in math score was not statistically significant (-0.06 [95% CI, -0.13 to 0.003]). Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that PICU patients were less likely to take standardized tests after discharge and that those who did had greater decreases in reading scores relative to matched controls. Future studies should identify risk factors for nonreturn to testing and score decrease.

JAMA Network OpenVol. 9(4)
Arkansas Children's Hospital (US), University of Michigan (US), Arkansas Department of Education (US), Children's Hospital Colorado (US), Michigan Medicine (US), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.