Advancing Brain Tumor Diagnosis Using Deep Learning: A Systematic and Critical Review on Methodological Approaches to Glioma Segmentation and Classification Through Multiparametric MRI

Background/Objectives: Brain tumors are highly lethal cancers, with gliomas representing the most complex subtype. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the main non-invasive imaging modality. This review evaluates deep learning (DL) and artificial intelligence methods for brain tumor segmentation and classification. Methods: In this systematic review, PubMed and Scopus were searched for articles published from 2022 to March 2025. Authors independently identified eligible studies based on predefined inclusion criteria and extracted data. The study quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) checklist. Results: Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria from 310 records, with eight addressing both segmentation and classification. Most segmentation studies used publicly available multiparametric MRI datasets. Performance varied by architecture and tumor region, with whole-tumor segmentation achieving the highest Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC). Classical U-Nets reported DSC values ranging 80–87%, while models with residual or attention mechanisms exceeded 90%. Classification focused on tumor type and glioma grading, using features learned from multiparametric MRI. Reported accuracy ranged from 91.3% to 99.4%, with sensitivity and specificity often above 95%. However, variability across tumor subregions, limited external validation, reliance on public datasets, and heterogeneous preprocessing raise concerns about robustness and real-world generalizability. Evidence on the use of explainability methods for both tasks remains limited. Conclusions: DL models for glioma segmentation and classification demonstrate promising performance. However, standardized validation protocols, multi-center datasets, and the integration of explainable artificial intelligence techniques are needed to improve transparency, robustness, and clinical applicability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Sciences
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16050468
Primary Topic
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing Brain Tumor Diagnosis Using Deep Learning: A Systematic and Critical Review on Methodological Approaches to Glioma Segmentation and Classification Through Multiparametric MRI

Christian Salvatore, Andrea Santamato, Claudia Cava, Isabella Castiglioni et al.
Brain Sciences
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
article

Advancing Brain Tumor Diagnosis Using Deep Learning: A Systematic and Critical Review on Methodological Approaches to Glioma Segmentation and Classification Through Multiparametric MRI

Christian Salvatore, Andrea Santamato, Claudia Cava, Isabella Castiglioni, Simona Aresta, Pietro Fiore, Gianvito Lagravinese, Petronilla Battista, Leonardo Rundo, Cinzia Palmirotta, Muhammad Asim, Gaia C. Santi, Gennaro D’Anna, Paolo Vitali
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Brain tumors are highly lethal cancers, with gliomas representing the most complex subtype. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the main non-invasive imaging modality. This review evaluates deep learning (DL) and artificial intelligence methods for brain tumor segmentation and classification. Methods: In this systematic review, PubMed and Scopus were searched for articles published from 2022 to March 2025. Authors independently identified eligible studies based on predefined inclusion criteria and extracted data. The study quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) checklist. Results: Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria from 310 records, with eight addressing both segmentation and classification. Most segmentation studies used publicly available multiparametric MRI datasets. Performance varied by architecture and tumor region, with whole-tumor segmentation achieving the highest Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC). Classical U-Nets reported DSC values ranging 80–87%, while models with residual or attention mechanisms exceeded 90%. Classification focused on tumor type and glioma grading, using features learned from multiparametric MRI. Reported accuracy ranged from 91.3% to 99.4%, with sensitivity and specificity often above 95%. However, variability across tumor subregions, limited external validation, reliance on public datasets, and heterogeneous preprocessing raise concerns about robustness and real-world generalizability. Evidence on the use of explainability methods for both tasks remains limited. Conclusions: DL models for glioma segmentation and classification demonstrate promising performance. However, standardized validation protocols, multi-center datasets, and the integration of explainable artificial intelligence techniques are needed to improve transparency, robustness, and clinical applicability.

Brain SciencesVol. 16(5)
University of Foggia (IT), University of Salerno (IT), University of Milan (IT), Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia (IT), Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri (IT), Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio (IT), Centro Diagnostico Italiano (IT), Ospedale San Giuseppe (IT), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.