Disaster Resilience in Serbia: A Narrative Synthesis of Institutional, Social, and Perception-Based Evidence

This paper examines disaster resilience from a multidisciplinary perspective in the Republic of Serbia. It analyses the development of disaster management within the contemporary Integrated Disaster Risk Reduction System, which is grounded in the core principles of community resilience. The study explores how resilience is perceived by stakeholders involved in its development, primarily institutions and their organizational structures in Serbia, as well as individuals, including professional representatives of institutions and citizens. Drawing on findings from studies measuring the resilience of local communities in Serbia, the paper identifies key challenges Serbia faces in strengthening disaster resilience. Although normative frameworks for enhancing resilience exist, mechanisms for implementing instruments at the local level remain insufficient. Limited public awareness, fragmented cooperation, and a pronounced reliance on central authorities persist as the main institutional constraints. At the individual level, structural and psychosocial factors shape perceptions of resilience. An assessment of the current status of key resilience stakeholders in Serbia indicates a clear need for continuous resilience measurement and for identifying the most influential determinants. Resilience cannot be adequately understood without a deeper and more comprehensive consideration of its constituent factors. Low perceived resilience among both institutional representatives and citizens underscores the need for comprehensive, targeted reforms to address deficiencies consistently revealed in empirical research. Strengthening the institutional capacities of local self-government units, encouraging citizen participation in planning processes, integrating traditional values with scientific approaches, and promoting a culture of prevention through education are among the short-term steps to be undertaken. In contrast, long-term strategic investment in community and institutional capacities is a fundamental requirement. These measures can foster social cohesion, institutional trust, and local capacities, which are key determinants of resilience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19910046
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disaster Resilience in Serbia: A Narrative Synthesis of Institutional, Social, and Perception-Based Evidence

Dalibor Milenković, Vladimir Cvetković
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

Disaster Resilience in Serbia: A Narrative Synthesis of Institutional, Social, and Perception-Based Evidence

Dalibor Milenković, Vladimir Cvetković
article en

Abstract

This paper examines disaster resilience from a multidisciplinary perspective in the Republic of Serbia. It analyses the development of disaster management within the contemporary Integrated Disaster Risk Reduction System, which is grounded in the core principles of community resilience. The study explores how resilience is perceived by stakeholders involved in its development, primarily institutions and their organizational structures in Serbia, as well as individuals, including professional representatives of institutions and citizens. Drawing on findings from studies measuring the resilience of local communities in Serbia, the paper identifies key challenges Serbia faces in strengthening disaster resilience. Although normative frameworks for enhancing resilience exist, mechanisms for implementing instruments at the local level remain insufficient. Limited public awareness, fragmented cooperation, and a pronounced reliance on central authorities persist as the main institutional constraints. At the individual level, structural and psychosocial factors shape perceptions of resilience. An assessment of the current status of key resilience stakeholders in Serbia indicates a clear need for continuous resilience measurement and for identifying the most influential determinants. Resilience cannot be adequately understood without a deeper and more comprehensive consideration of its constituent factors. Low perceived resilience among both institutional representatives and citizens underscores the need for comprehensive, targeted reforms to address deficiencies consistently revealed in empirical research. Strengthening the institutional capacities of local self-government units, encouraging citizen participation in planning processes, integrating traditional values with scientific approaches, and promoting a culture of prevention through education are among the short-term steps to be undertaken. In contrast, long-term strategic investment in community and institutional capacities is a fundamental requirement. These measures can foster social cohesion, institutional trust, and local capacities, which are key determinants of resilience.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Belgrade (RS), Oncology Institute of Vojvodina (RS)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.