Prevalence and Characteristics of INOCA in Patients With Either Angiographically Normal Vessels or Non‐Obstructive Coronary Atherosclerosis. Insights From the All‐Comers Prospective AID‐ANGIO Study
BACKGROUND: Myocardial ischemia of non-obstructive origin (INOCA) is a prevalent cause of chronic coronary syndromes (CCS). Risk factors for atherosclerosis have also been described to promote INOCA, raising the question whether these entities are clinically related. AIMS: Our aim was to compare the prevalence and clinical characteristics of INOCA in patients with and without coronary atherosclerosis. METHODS: Sub-analysis of the all-comers, prospective, multicentre AID-ANGIO study, enrolling consecutive CCS patients, referred for coronary angiography. Obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) was investigated by angiography and pressure guidewires. In the absence of obstructive-CAD, functional coronary testing (FCT) was performed within the same procedure. All patients diagnosed with INOCA were classified according to the evidence of non-obstructive atherosclerosis (INOCA-Ath) or the presence of angiographically normal coronary arteries (INOCA-NoAth). RESULTS: In the AID ANGIO study, 89 patients presented non-obstructive coronary atherosclerosis and 104 had angiographically normal coronary arteries. Prevalence of INOCA-Ath and INOCA-NoAth was 78.7% and 70.2%, respectively (p = 0.181). Patients' symptoms, results from ischemia tests and endotype distribution were comparable in both groups. Vasomotor abnormalities were the most frequently identified (81.4% INOCA-Ath vs. 74.0% INOCA-NoAth; p = 0.285). INOCA endotype was not predicted by the presence of coronary atherosclerosis, typical anginal symptoms, a positive ischemia test or atherogenic risk factors, whereas a youger age was associated with vasomotor disorders. CONCLUSIONS: In an all-comers population of patients with CCS, prevalence of INOCA was similar in patients with and without non-obstructive CAD. Clinical features and endotype distribution were also comparable, highlighting the need for FCT to make a correct diagnosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The present study was conducted as a sub-analysis of the AID-ANGIO trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT056359949).
Authors
- Giulia Nardi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8144-0117)
- Alejandro Travieso (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3013-2592)
- Alberto García‐Lledó (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8986-2584)
- Inmaculada Fernández‐Rozas
- José Gildardo Paredes-Vázquez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6895-8026)
- Luca Paolucci (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3290-4053)
- Carmen Olmos (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9544-0508)
- Juan Carlos Gómez-Polo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2100-8063)
- Alejandro Curcio
- J Playán
- Juan Carlos Diaz-Polanco
- Akram Lahrifa
- Hernan Mejia-Renteria
- A Jeronimo
- Javier Escaned
- Marco Lombardi
- Nieves Gonzalo
Institutions
- Hospital Clínico San Carlos (ES)
- Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias (ES)
- Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada (ES)
- Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa (ES)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
- Published
- 2026-04-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70644
- Primary Topic
- Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00