Identity Persistence Calculus_A Downstream Method for Applying the Forcing Theorem

Zenodo abstract Identity Persistence Calculus presents a derived application layer for evaluating identity persistence claims under transformation. It does not extend the Tier-1 forcing theorem for identity persistence; rather, it translates that theorem into a usable diagnostic procedure. The calculus requires any same/not-same persistence claim to specify an identity-bearing unit, state space, admissible transformations, identity-relevant quotient, continuation map, invariant vector, governance scalar, and drift bound. It then returns one of five verdicts: PERSIST, BREAK, BRANCH, UNDEFINED, or REGIME-CHANGE. The method is applied to four cases: Ship of Theseus, software artifact / VERIFY bundle identity, identity under flux in Heraclitus’s river and biological organisms, and AI model-version identity under replay and drift. Across these cases, apparent paradoxes are shown to arise from under-specified identity-bearing regimes rather than from identity persistence itself. The result is not a new metaphysical theory and does not claim ontological instantiation. It is a structured evaluation method for determining whether a persistence claim has been made coherently, non-arbitrarily, and within a declared admissibility regime.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19905403
Primary Topic
Scientific Computing and Data Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identity Persistence Calculus_A Downstream Method for Applying the Forcing Theorem

Devin Bostick
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Scientific Computing and Data Management
article

Identity Persistence Calculus_A Downstream Method for Applying the Forcing Theorem

Devin Bostick
article en

Abstract

Zenodo abstract Identity Persistence Calculus presents a derived application layer for evaluating identity persistence claims under transformation. It does not extend the Tier-1 forcing theorem for identity persistence; rather, it translates that theorem into a usable diagnostic procedure. The calculus requires any same/not-same persistence claim to specify an identity-bearing unit, state space, admissible transformations, identity-relevant quotient, continuation map, invariant vector, governance scalar, and drift bound. It then returns one of five verdicts: PERSIST, BREAK, BRANCH, UNDEFINED, or REGIME-CHANGE. The method is applied to four cases: Ship of Theseus, software artifact / VERIFY bundle identity, identity under flux in Heraclitus’s river and biological organisms, and AI model-version identity under replay and drift. Across these cases, apparent paradoxes are shown to arise from under-specified identity-bearing regimes rather than from identity persistence itself. The result is not a new metaphysical theory and does not claim ontological instantiation. It is a structured evaluation method for determining whether a persistence claim has been made coherently, non-arbitrarily, and within a declared admissibility regime.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Scientific Computing and Data Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.