Multi‐State Implementation of the Alzheimer's Association Dementia Care Coordination ( <scp>DCC</scp> ) Program

BACKGROUND: The Alzheimer's Association partnered with health systems in Illinois, Greater Missouri, and Washington to implement and evaluate the Knight Family dementia care coordination (DCC) program, a novel telephone-based care coordination service that bridged the gap between clinical care and community support. Healthcare providers were trained to systematically identify dementia caregivers and refer them to Alzheimer's Association care consultants who provided personalized education, resources, and support. This innovative model addressed critical care coordination gaps in dementia care delivery. METHODS: A mixed-methods process evaluation assessed DCC implementation and caregiver outcomes. Caregivers completed validated surveys at baseline and follow-up, including the PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Emotions scale and the general self-efficacy scale (GSE). Surveys also captured action plan uptake, resource utilization, and barriers to implementation. Health system employees completed surveys and structured interviews about program satisfaction and workflow integration. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the RE-AIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) guided identification of barriers, facilitators, and implementation outcomes. RESULTS: Caregiver self-efficacy scores were mixed: approximately 44%-45% improved on the self-efficacy scales at follow-up, while a nearly equal proportion (42%-44%) worsened. Mean PROMIS scores showed no significant change (all p > 0.4), and mean GSE scores declined slightly but significantly at 3 months. Although improvements in self-efficacy were not consistently observed, caregivers demonstrated high program engagement: 70% completed action steps, 80% utilized community resources, and 90% demonstrated comprehension of their individualized action plans. Health system employees reported high program satisfaction, though clinician engagement remained a barrier. CONCLUSIONS: This multi-state evaluation demonstrates the feasibility of implementing a telephone-based dementia care coordination program across diverse health systems and highlighted strong caregiver engagement with program resources. However, self-efficacy outcomes did not show consistent improvement. Controlled trials are needed to determine which caregivers benefit most and whether more intensive or targeted interventions are required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.70475
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi‐State Implementation of the Alzheimer's Association Dementia Care Coordination ( DCC ) Program

Sarra Latif, Sam Fazio, Monica Moreno, Kerry Finegan et al.
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Multi‐State Implementation of the Alzheimer's Association Dementia Care Coordination ( DCC ) Program

Sarra Latif, Sam Fazio, Monica Moreno, Kerry Finegan, Lauren Stratton, Sonia Talwar, Nancy A Hodgson, Liming Huang
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Alzheimer's Association partnered with health systems in Illinois, Greater Missouri, and Washington to implement and evaluate the Knight Family dementia care coordination (DCC) program, a novel telephone-based care coordination service that bridged the gap between clinical care and community support. Healthcare providers were trained to systematically identify dementia caregivers and refer them to Alzheimer's Association care consultants who provided personalized education, resources, and support. This innovative model addressed critical care coordination gaps in dementia care delivery. METHODS: A mixed-methods process evaluation assessed DCC implementation and caregiver outcomes. Caregivers completed validated surveys at baseline and follow-up, including the PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Emotions scale and the general self-efficacy scale (GSE). Surveys also captured action plan uptake, resource utilization, and barriers to implementation. Health system employees completed surveys and structured interviews about program satisfaction and workflow integration. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the RE-AIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) guided identification of barriers, facilitators, and implementation outcomes. RESULTS: Caregiver self-efficacy scores were mixed: approximately 44%-45% improved on the self-efficacy scales at follow-up, while a nearly equal proportion (42%-44%) worsened. Mean PROMIS scores showed no significant change (all p > 0.4), and mean GSE scores declined slightly but significantly at 3 months. Although improvements in self-efficacy were not consistently observed, caregivers demonstrated high program engagement: 70% completed action steps, 80% utilized community resources, and 90% demonstrated comprehension of their individualized action plans. Health system employees reported high program satisfaction, though clinician engagement remained a barrier. CONCLUSIONS: This multi-state evaluation demonstrates the feasibility of implementing a telephone-based dementia care coordination program across diverse health systems and highlighted strong caregiver engagement with program resources. However, self-efficacy outcomes did not show consistent improvement. Controlled trials are needed to determine which caregivers benefit most and whether more intensive or targeted interventions are required.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Alzheimer's Association (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Alzheimer's Association
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.