Repeat invitations and participation in cervical screening: A population-based cohort study

ObjectiveCervical cancer screening reduces incidence and mortality dependent on participation. To increase participation we investigated the best time to send repeated invitation (RI) letters to those who did not attend screening after the first letter.MethodsWe designed a prospective population-based cohort study featuring 3,352,211 first invitation letters and 2,449,187 RI letters sent between 2012-01-01 and 2023-12-31 to all Swedish screening-eligible women aged 23 to 70. We measured participation rates based on the time between invitation letters and their first RIs, adjusted for age, calendar month/year, screening test (HPV/cytology), and healthcare region.ResultsThe strongest RI-to-participation association was observed for RIs sent 8-12 weeks after the invitation letter, with 65% participation and adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.42 (1.34-1.50). This was consistent for women below 50, aOR 1.35 (1.28-1.44) / 64% participation; and women above 50, aOR 1.95 (1.63-2.32) / 72% participation. Participation declined with number of RIs sent, with the first RI followed by 49% participation and the seventh followed by 21% participation. Only 10.9% of the screening population required a fourth RI or more.ConclusionSending a RI 8-12 weeks after the original invitation was associated with the highest participation. After sending four RIs other methods of communication should be employed to encourage screening participation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Screening
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413261446572
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Repeat invitations and participation in cervical screening: A population-based cohort study

Nicholas Baltzer, Joakim Dillner, Karin Sundström
Journal of Medical Screening
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Repeat invitations and participation in cervical screening: A population-based cohort study

Nicholas Baltzer, Joakim Dillner, Karin Sundström
article en

Abstract

ObjectiveCervical cancer screening reduces incidence and mortality dependent on participation. To increase participation we investigated the best time to send repeated invitation (RI) letters to those who did not attend screening after the first letter.MethodsWe designed a prospective population-based cohort study featuring 3,352,211 first invitation letters and 2,449,187 RI letters sent between 2012-01-01 and 2023-12-31 to all Swedish screening-eligible women aged 23 to 70. We measured participation rates based on the time between invitation letters and their first RIs, adjusted for age, calendar month/year, screening test (HPV/cytology), and healthcare region.ResultsThe strongest RI-to-participation association was observed for RIs sent 8-12 weeks after the invitation letter, with 65% participation and adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.42 (1.34-1.50). This was consistent for women below 50, aOR 1.35 (1.28-1.44) / 64% participation; and women above 50, aOR 1.95 (1.63-2.32) / 72% participation. Participation declined with number of RIs sent, with the first RI followed by 49% participation and the seventh followed by 21% participation. Only 10.9% of the screening population required a fourth RI or more.ConclusionSending a RI 8-12 weeks after the original invitation was associated with the highest participation. After sending four RIs other methods of communication should be employed to encourage screening participation.

Journal of Medical Screening
Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Cancerfonden
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.