Effectiveness of clear aligners for maxillary expansion in growing patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Maxillary transverse deficiency is one of the most common issues encountered in orthodontic practice. Ideally, intervention should take place before the midpalatal suture has completely ossified, in order to take advantage of the patient's active growth. In recent years, treatment with clear aligners has emerged as an alternative to fixed appliances, offering a new way to achieve expansion in paediatric patients. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to analyse the predictability of movements induced by clear aligners in maxillary expansion, and to compare the effectiveness of the Invisalign First® system with conventional expansion appliances. SEARCH METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed-Medline, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane databases. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Retrospective and prospective studies, as well as one randomised clinical trial, published between January 2021 and October 2025, which answered the PICO question, were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: statistic, and the results were presented in a forest plot. The Trim and Fill method was used to assess publication bias. RESULTS: ; - 738.32; - 182.94 95%CI; - 3.25 Z-test, p = 0.0011); and arch perimeter ( - 1.75 mm; - 2.71; - 0.80 95%CI; - 3.59 Z-test, p = 0.0003). These results indicate that aligners produce significantly less skeletal transverse expansion than conventional expanders. CONCLUSIONS: Clear aligners appear to be capable of producing maxillary expansion, mainly through dentoalveolar changes that are more evident in the anterior region and at the level of deciduous teeth. In patients presenting with more pronounced transverse deficiencies, conventional expanders seem to achieve greater skeletal and posterior transverse changes. However, given that most of the current evidence derives from retrospective studies with moderate risk of bias, these conclusions should be interpreted cautiously and confirmed by well-designed prospective research. REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420250608558.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Progress in Orthodontics
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-026-00620-7
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of clear aligners for maxillary expansion in growing patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Vanessa Paredes-Gallardo, José María Montiel-Company, Lucía Fonseca Planells, Carlos Bellot-Arcís
Progress in Orthodontics
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Effectiveness of clear aligners for maxillary expansion in growing patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Vanessa Paredes-Gallardo, José María Montiel-Company, Lucía Fonseca Planells, Carlos Bellot-Arcís
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Maxillary transverse deficiency is one of the most common issues encountered in orthodontic practice. Ideally, intervention should take place before the midpalatal suture has completely ossified, in order to take advantage of the patient's active growth. In recent years, treatment with clear aligners has emerged as an alternative to fixed appliances, offering a new way to achieve expansion in paediatric patients. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to analyse the predictability of movements induced by clear aligners in maxillary expansion, and to compare the effectiveness of the Invisalign First® system with conventional expansion appliances. SEARCH METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed-Medline, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane databases. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Retrospective and prospective studies, as well as one randomised clinical trial, published between January 2021 and October 2025, which answered the PICO question, were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: statistic, and the results were presented in a forest plot. The Trim and Fill method was used to assess publication bias. RESULTS: ; - 738.32; - 182.94 95%CI; - 3.25 Z-test, p = 0.0011); and arch perimeter ( - 1.75 mm; - 2.71; - 0.80 95%CI; - 3.59 Z-test, p = 0.0003). These results indicate that aligners produce significantly less skeletal transverse expansion than conventional expanders. CONCLUSIONS: Clear aligners appear to be capable of producing maxillary expansion, mainly through dentoalveolar changes that are more evident in the anterior region and at the level of deciduous teeth. In patients presenting with more pronounced transverse deficiencies, conventional expanders seem to achieve greater skeletal and posterior transverse changes. However, given that most of the current evidence derives from retrospective studies with moderate risk of bias, these conclusions should be interpreted cautiously and confirmed by well-designed prospective research. REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420250608558.

Progress in OrthodonticsVol. 27(1)
Universitat de València (ES)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.