Corneal backscatter as a biomarker for edema severity in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) is characterized by progressive endothelial dysfunction and corneal edema. Reliable objective biomarkers for grading disease severity are currently evolving. Corneal backscatter may reflect edema-related changes in corneal transparency and could serve as an additional objective measure of FECD severity across different edema stages. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential of corneal backscatter as a biomarker for severity of FECD. METHODS: In this retrospective, observational, single-center cross-sectional study, 99 eyes of 67 patients with FECD were divided into three groups depending on the presence of clinical, subclinical or no corneal edema. The corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was obtained and Scheimpflug tomography was performed. Subclinical corneal edema was diagnosed if more than one of the following criteria were present in Scheimpflug tomography: loss of regular isopachs, displacement of the thinnest point of the cornea, and focal posterior corneal surface depression. Clinical corneal edema was diagnosed by slit-lamp biomicroscopy. The primary outcome was the difference in total corneal backscatter in the central 2-mm zone. Secondary analyses were the correlation of corneal backscatter to CDVA, tomographic parameters such as central corneal thickness (CCT) and thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), as well as their diagnostic accuracy and predictive potential to differentiate between edema severity. RESULTS: = 0.096; P = 0.004). Central corneal backscatter in the anterior 120 µm demonstrated moderate diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing subclinical corneal edema from no edema (threshold = 31.2 GSU; AUC = 0.73) or clinical edema (threshold = 34.9 GSU; AUC = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Our study corroborates that corneal backscatter values increase with increasing corneal edema stage and therefore present a potential adjunctive biomarker to assess FECD severity in addition to edema status and clinical gradings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Eye and Vision
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-026-00483-3
Primary Topic
Corneal surgery and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corneal backscatter as a biomarker for edema severity in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: a cross-sectional study

Lizaveta Chychko, Maximilian Friedrich, Victor Aristide Augustin, Timur M. Yildirim et al.
Eye and Vision
Corneal surgery and disorders
article

Corneal backscatter as a biomarker for edema severity in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: a cross-sectional study

Lizaveta Chychko, Maximilian Friedrich, Victor Aristide Augustin, Timur M. Yildirim, Gerd Uwe Auffarth, Maximilian Hammer, Hyeck-Soo Son, Lasha-Giorgi Turava, Louise Blöck
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) is characterized by progressive endothelial dysfunction and corneal edema. Reliable objective biomarkers for grading disease severity are currently evolving. Corneal backscatter may reflect edema-related changes in corneal transparency and could serve as an additional objective measure of FECD severity across different edema stages. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential of corneal backscatter as a biomarker for severity of FECD. METHODS: In this retrospective, observational, single-center cross-sectional study, 99 eyes of 67 patients with FECD were divided into three groups depending on the presence of clinical, subclinical or no corneal edema. The corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was obtained and Scheimpflug tomography was performed. Subclinical corneal edema was diagnosed if more than one of the following criteria were present in Scheimpflug tomography: loss of regular isopachs, displacement of the thinnest point of the cornea, and focal posterior corneal surface depression. Clinical corneal edema was diagnosed by slit-lamp biomicroscopy. The primary outcome was the difference in total corneal backscatter in the central 2-mm zone. Secondary analyses were the correlation of corneal backscatter to CDVA, tomographic parameters such as central corneal thickness (CCT) and thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), as well as their diagnostic accuracy and predictive potential to differentiate between edema severity. RESULTS: = 0.096; P = 0.004). Central corneal backscatter in the anterior 120 µm demonstrated moderate diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing subclinical corneal edema from no edema (threshold = 31.2 GSU; AUC = 0.73) or clinical edema (threshold = 34.9 GSU; AUC = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Our study corroborates that corneal backscatter values increase with increasing corneal edema stage and therefore present a potential adjunctive biomarker to assess FECD severity in addition to edema status and clinical gradings.

Eye and VisionVol. 13(1)
Heidelberg University (DE), Augenklinik Heidelberg (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Corneal surgery and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.