Does the Timing of USMLE Step 1 Affect Performance? A Comparison of Pre- and Post-Clerkship Timing in the Pass/Fail Era

In 2022, Step 1 of the United States Medical Licensing Examination transitioned to pass/fail scoring, removing a major performance-oriented incentive that historically shaped how and why students prepared for the exam. While Step 1 is typically taken before clerkships, some medical schools have shifted the exam to after core clerkships, citing potential benefits for learning and integration. This study examined whether the timing of Step 1 continues to influence performance outcomes in the pass/fail era, using achievement goal theory and self-determination theory as conceptual lenses. Achievement goal theory distinguishes among mastery-approach, performance-approach, and performance-avoidance goals that fluctuate across contexts; self-determination theory emphasizes how assessment environments support autonomous versus controlled forms of motivation. This study compared outcomes at 20 US medical schools that administered Step 1 after clerkships to those at a matched group of schools that administered the exam pre-clerkships. All students matriculated in 2020 and took Step 1 on or after January 26, 2022, when pass/fail scoring began. We matched schools based on average Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) scores to help control for incoming academic ability. We used a resampling procedure with 10,000 replications to estimate average differences in Step 1 and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) failure rates and scores. Compared to matched pre-clerkship schools, post-clerkship schools had a slightly lower Step 1 failure rate (mean difference: 1.02%, SD = 0.89, CI = 1.00-1.04%). In contrast, Step 2 CK outcomes modestly favored pre-clerkship schools: failure rates were 0.39% lower (SD = 0.21, CI = 0.39-0.4%) and scores were 1.03 points higher (SD = 0.53, CI = 1.02-1.04%) on average. Across all outcomes, differences were small and unlikely to be educationally meaningful. Among students at post-clerkship schools, a shorter interval between Step 1 and Step 2 CK was associated with slightly higher Step 2 CK scores for students with lower MCAT scores, whereas the interval had little impact for students with higher MCAT scores. In the pass/fail context, the timing of Step 1, before or after clerkships, appears to have minimal influence on performance outcomes. These findings suggest that changes to Step 1 scoring and timing alone are unlikely to shift learner behavior; broader assessment and curricular reforms that intentionally foster autonomous, mastery-oriented learning may be needed to support deep learning, well-being, and readiness for practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Teaching and Learning in Medicine
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2026.2662341
Primary Topic
Medical Education and Admissions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does the Timing of USMLE Step 1 Affect Performance? A Comparison of Pre- and Post-Clerkship Timing in the Pass/Fail Era

Seetha U. Monrad, Rebecca L. Toonkel, Arnyce R. Pock, Aubrie Swan Sein et al.
Teaching and Learning in Medicine
Medical Education and Admissions
article

Does the Timing of USMLE Step 1 Affect Performance? A Comparison of Pre- and Post-Clerkship Timing in the Pass/Fail Era

Seetha U. Monrad, Rebecca L. Toonkel, Arnyce R. Pock, Aubrie Swan Sein, Michael S. Ryan, Sara B. Fazio, Jennifer R. Kogan, Daniel Jurich, Nadia Ismail, Christine Seibert, Marc Johnson, Karen E Hauer, David Gordon, Michelle Daniel, Sally Santen
article en

Abstract

In 2022, Step 1 of the United States Medical Licensing Examination transitioned to pass/fail scoring, removing a major performance-oriented incentive that historically shaped how and why students prepared for the exam. While Step 1 is typically taken before clerkships, some medical schools have shifted the exam to after core clerkships, citing potential benefits for learning and integration. This study examined whether the timing of Step 1 continues to influence performance outcomes in the pass/fail era, using achievement goal theory and self-determination theory as conceptual lenses. Achievement goal theory distinguishes among mastery-approach, performance-approach, and performance-avoidance goals that fluctuate across contexts; self-determination theory emphasizes how assessment environments support autonomous versus controlled forms of motivation. This study compared outcomes at 20 US medical schools that administered Step 1 after clerkships to those at a matched group of schools that administered the exam pre-clerkships. All students matriculated in 2020 and took Step 1 on or after January 26, 2022, when pass/fail scoring began. We matched schools based on average Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) scores to help control for incoming academic ability. We used a resampling procedure with 10,000 replications to estimate average differences in Step 1 and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) failure rates and scores. Compared to matched pre-clerkship schools, post-clerkship schools had a slightly lower Step 1 failure rate (mean difference: 1.02%, SD = 0.89, CI = 1.00-1.04%). In contrast, Step 2 CK outcomes modestly favored pre-clerkship schools: failure rates were 0.39% lower (SD = 0.21, CI = 0.39-0.4%) and scores were 1.03 points higher (SD = 0.53, CI = 1.02-1.04%) on average. Across all outcomes, differences were small and unlikely to be educationally meaningful. Among students at post-clerkship schools, a shorter interval between Step 1 and Step 2 CK was associated with slightly higher Step 2 CK scores for students with lower MCAT scores, whereas the interval had little impact for students with higher MCAT scores. In the pass/fail context, the timing of Step 1, before or after clerkships, appears to have minimal influence on performance outcomes. These findings suggest that changes to Step 1 scoring and timing alone are unlikely to shift learner behavior; broader assessment and curricular reforms that intentionally foster autonomous, mastery-oriented learning may be needed to support deep learning, well-being, and readiness for practice.

Teaching and Learning in Medicine
National Board of Medical Examiners (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Harvard University (US), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US), University of San Diego (US), Duke University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), University of Michigan (US), Hodges University (US), University of California San Diego (US), Wisconsin Division of Public Health (US), Columbia College (CA), University of Virginia (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), Orion Corporation (United Kingdom) (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Medical Education and Admissions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.