Quality of Life and Humanistic Burden of Adults with Type 1 Diabetes with Recurrent Severe Hypoglycemic Events and Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycemia Using a Continuous Glucose Monitor

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to examine psychosocial well-being, quality of life (QoL), and productivity in people with type 1 diabetes (pwT1D) who were experiencing recurrent severe hypoglycemic events (SHEs) and impaired awareness of hypoglycemia (IAH), despite using continuous glucose monitors (CGMs). METHODS: The study utilized a cross-sectional, observational design which incorporated an online survey about SHE experiences, diabetes-related complications, psychosocial burden, QoL, and productivity in a sample of adult pwT1D who use CGM in the United States. Participants completed measures of IAH status (modified Gold score ≥ 4 = IAH), diabetes distress (DDS-17), fear of hypoglycemia (HFS-II), QoL (DIDP and EQ-5D-5L), and productivity (DPM). Participants were categorized into two cohorts based on self-reported history of SHEs and IAH: the cohort of recurrent SHE [≥ 2 SHEs in the past 12 months] with IAH, and the cohort of No SHE and No IAH to provide context. Unadjusted comparisons (Welch's t test, Pearson's chi-squared test) were conducted to describe differences across cohorts. RESULTS: In this US study population of adult CGM users, the recurrent SHE (≥ 2) with IAH cohort included 174 participants, and the No SHE and No IAH cohort included 689 participants. On average, participants with recurrent SHEs and IAH reported 8.6 SHEs in the past year. Compared to those with No SHE and No IAH, those with recurrent SHEs and IAH had a higher psychosocial burden (fear of hypoglycemia and diabetes distress), lower QoL, worse overall health status, and reduced productivity (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite using CGM, adults with T1D with recurrent SHEs and IAH experienced lower psychosocial well-being, QoL, and reduced productivity compared to adults with T1D with no SHEs and no IAH, highlighting the unmet need for novel therapies for this group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Therapy
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-026-01869-1
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality of Life and Humanistic Burden of Adults with Type 1 Diabetes with Recurrent Severe Hypoglycemic Events and Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycemia Using a Continuous Glucose Monitor

Adriana Boateng-Kuffour, Wendy A. Wolf, EMILEE M. CORNELIUS, Beth Barber et al.
Diabetes Therapy
Diabetes Management and Research
article

Quality of Life and Humanistic Burden of Adults with Type 1 Diabetes with Recurrent Severe Hypoglycemic Events and Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycemia Using a Continuous Glucose Monitor

Adriana Boateng-Kuffour, Wendy A. Wolf, EMILEE M. CORNELIUS, Beth Barber, Keval Chandarana, Caitlin S Kelly, Nanxin Li, Liang Chen, William H Polonsky, Katherine S Chapman, Huyen T Nguyen
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to examine psychosocial well-being, quality of life (QoL), and productivity in people with type 1 diabetes (pwT1D) who were experiencing recurrent severe hypoglycemic events (SHEs) and impaired awareness of hypoglycemia (IAH), despite using continuous glucose monitors (CGMs). METHODS: The study utilized a cross-sectional, observational design which incorporated an online survey about SHE experiences, diabetes-related complications, psychosocial burden, QoL, and productivity in a sample of adult pwT1D who use CGM in the United States. Participants completed measures of IAH status (modified Gold score ≥ 4 = IAH), diabetes distress (DDS-17), fear of hypoglycemia (HFS-II), QoL (DIDP and EQ-5D-5L), and productivity (DPM). Participants were categorized into two cohorts based on self-reported history of SHEs and IAH: the cohort of recurrent SHE [≥ 2 SHEs in the past 12 months] with IAH, and the cohort of No SHE and No IAH to provide context. Unadjusted comparisons (Welch's t test, Pearson's chi-squared test) were conducted to describe differences across cohorts. RESULTS: In this US study population of adult CGM users, the recurrent SHE (≥ 2) with IAH cohort included 174 participants, and the No SHE and No IAH cohort included 689 participants. On average, participants with recurrent SHEs and IAH reported 8.6 SHEs in the past year. Compared to those with No SHE and No IAH, those with recurrent SHEs and IAH had a higher psychosocial burden (fear of hypoglycemia and diabetes distress), lower QoL, worse overall health status, and reduced productivity (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite using CGM, adults with T1D with recurrent SHEs and IAH experienced lower psychosocial well-being, QoL, and reduced productivity compared to adults with T1D with no SHEs and no IAH, highlighting the unmet need for novel therapies for this group.

Diabetes Therapy
T1D Exchange (US), Vertex Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US)
Vertex Pharmaceuticals
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Diabetes Management and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.