A comparison of misophonia proportion and patterns of uncomfortable loudness levels between individuals with and without hyperacusis reporting sensitivity to environmental sounds

OBJECTIVE: To compare audiological characteristics and misophonia symptoms proportion in young adults with normal hearing and self-reported sound sensitivity (without tinnitus), classified as having hyperacusis status. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. Participants classified as having hyperacusis (ULLmin ≤77 dB HL) or non-hyperacusis (>77 dB HL). Misophonia symptoms were identified using screening thresholds: Sound Sensitivity Symptoms Questionnaire item 4 (SSSQ4 ≥ 2) or Misophonia Questionnaire-Misophonia Severity Scale (MQ-MSS ≥7). Audiological variables included ULLmin (uncomfortable loudness level minimum), slopes, asymmetry, and repetition differences. STUDY SAMPLE: 153 participants (19-31 years), recruited via social media. RESULTS: = 0.020). Multivariable analysis showed that hyperacusis was the strongest predictor of misophonia, with ULLmin and slope contributing. CONCLUSIONS: Many individuals reporting sound sensitivity did not meet objective criteria for hyperacusis, underscoring the value of measures such as ULLmin. The higher prevalence of misophonia symptoms in hyperacusis and their shared audiological correlates suggest substantial overlap between decreased sound tolerance subtypes. These findings support integrated audiological-psychometric assessment and highlight the need for longitudinal and neuroimaging studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Audiology
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2026.2642751
Primary Topic
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparison of misophonia proportion and patterns of uncomfortable loudness levels between individuals with and without hyperacusis reporting sensitivity to environmental sounds

Hashir Aazh, Farzaneh Fatahi, Ahmad Rasouli, Maryam Zaree et al.
International Journal of Audiology
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
article

A comparison of misophonia proportion and patterns of uncomfortable loudness levels between individuals with and without hyperacusis reporting sensitivity to environmental sounds

Hashir Aazh, Farzaneh Fatahi, Ahmad Rasouli, Maryam Zaree, Vida Rahimi
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare audiological characteristics and misophonia symptoms proportion in young adults with normal hearing and self-reported sound sensitivity (without tinnitus), classified as having hyperacusis status. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. Participants classified as having hyperacusis (ULLmin ≤77 dB HL) or non-hyperacusis (>77 dB HL). Misophonia symptoms were identified using screening thresholds: Sound Sensitivity Symptoms Questionnaire item 4 (SSSQ4 ≥ 2) or Misophonia Questionnaire-Misophonia Severity Scale (MQ-MSS ≥7). Audiological variables included ULLmin (uncomfortable loudness level minimum), slopes, asymmetry, and repetition differences. STUDY SAMPLE: 153 participants (19-31 years), recruited via social media. RESULTS: = 0.020). Multivariable analysis showed that hyperacusis was the strongest predictor of misophonia, with ULLmin and slope contributing. CONCLUSIONS: Many individuals reporting sound sensitivity did not meet objective criteria for hyperacusis, underscoring the value of measures such as ULLmin. The higher prevalence of misophonia symptoms in hyperacusis and their shared audiological correlates suggest substantial overlap between decreased sound tolerance subtypes. These findings support integrated audiological-psychometric assessment and highlight the need for longitudinal and neuroimaging studies.

International Journal of Audiology
Asser Institute (NL), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.