RObotic WAlking for children who CAnnot WAlk (RoWaCaWa): feasibility and family impacts and perspectives of a family-led intervention

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility, impacts, and perspectives of a family-led robotic walking intervention. MATERIALS & METHODS: percentile)) and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Qualitative interviews captured family perspectives and were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: ≤ 0.001) of goals increased. Parents described positive changes in social experiences and family interactions and difficulties with the logistics of robotic walking. CONCLUSIONS: This family-led robotic walking intervention resulted in improvements in individual goals, though families did struggle with some logistics of robotic walking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disability and Rehabilitation
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2026.2663905
Primary Topic
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RObotic WAlking for children who CAnnot WAlk (RoWaCaWa): feasibility and family impacts and perspectives of a family-led intervention

Jennifer Zwicker, Kelly A. Larkin-Kaiser, Patricia E. Longmuir, Christa M. Diot et al.
Disability and Rehabilitation
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
article

RObotic WAlking for children who CAnnot WAlk (RoWaCaWa): feasibility and family impacts and perspectives of a family-led intervention

Jennifer Zwicker, Kelly A. Larkin-Kaiser, Patricia E. Longmuir, Christa M. Diot, Sean Peter Dukelow, Karin Eldred, Hana Alazem, Elizabeth G. Condliffe, Benjamin M. Norman, Jessica L Youngblood, Anna McCormick
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility, impacts, and perspectives of a family-led robotic walking intervention. MATERIALS & METHODS: percentile)) and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Qualitative interviews captured family perspectives and were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: ≤ 0.001) of goals increased. Parents described positive changes in social experiences and family interactions and difficulties with the logistics of robotic walking. CONCLUSIONS: This family-led robotic walking intervention resulted in improvements in individual goals, though families did struggle with some logistics of robotic walking.

Disability and Rehabilitation
Allen Institute for Brain Science (US), University of Ottawa (CA), University of Calgary (CA), Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CA), Alberta Children's Hospital (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

RObotic WAlking for children who CAnnot WAlk (RoWaCaWa): feasibility and family impacts and perspectives of a family-led intervention — Jennifer Zwicker, Kelly A. Larkin-Kaiser, et al. · Disability and Rehabilitation (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS