Dosimetric advantages of non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using biaxially rotational dynamic radiation therapy compared with coplanar VMAT in prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy with focal boost

PURPOSE: To identify dosimetric advantages of biaxially rotational dynamic radiation therapy (BROAD-RT) for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with focal boost for non-metastatic prostate cancer (PCa), compared with coplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy (co-VMAT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: BROAD-RT is a unique beam delivery technique, which facilitates sequential non-coplanar beam delivery without the need to rotate the couch or reposition the patient. For 15 patients with non-metastatic PCa, two different plans (BROAD-RT and co-VMAT) were created, and these plans and dosimetric indices were compared. The prescribed dose was 35 Gy in 5 fractions to the whole prostate gland, and that to the intra-prostatic dominant lesions (IPDLs) was increased up to 50 Gy. Quality assurance (QA) was performed for BROAD-RT and co-VMAT plans from the 15 patients, and the calculated and measured dose distributions were evaluated according to global gamma analysis using ArcCHECK. RESULTS: The dose coverage of the target volumes and the high-dose exposure to organs at risk (rectum, bladder, and urethra) were not significantly different between BROAD-RT and co-VMAT plans. The normal tissue dose outside of the planning target volume (PTV) (maximum dose 2 cm away from PTV [D2 cm], and 30%, 50%, or 70% isodose volume divided by the volume of PTV [R30, R50, and R70]) were significantly lower in the BROAD-RT plan (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). In QA, average (± standard deviation) passing rates were 98.2 ± 0.7% for BROAD-RT and 99.0 ± 1.0% for co-VMAT. CONCLUSION: Non-coplanar VMAT via BROAD-RT improved the dose distribution, mainly outside of the PTV and for some of the organs at risks, in prostate SBRT with focal boost compared with coplanar VMAT. Therefore, as BROAD-RT enables practical implementation of non-coplanar VMAT, it is considered a promising radiotherapy method of SBRT with focal boost for non-metastatic PCa.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Japanese Journal of Radiology
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-026-01974-y
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dosimetric advantages of non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using biaxially rotational dynamic radiation therapy compared with coplanar VMAT in prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy with focal boost

Rihito Aizawa, Shinya Hiraoka, Hideaki Hirashima, Yuka Ono et al.
Japanese Journal of Radiology
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

Dosimetric advantages of non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using biaxially rotational dynamic radiation therapy compared with coplanar VMAT in prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy with focal boost

Rihito Aizawa, Shinya Hiraoka, Hideaki Hirashima, Yuka Ono, Takashi Mizowaki, Mitsuhiro Nakamura, Takashi Ogata
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify dosimetric advantages of biaxially rotational dynamic radiation therapy (BROAD-RT) for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with focal boost for non-metastatic prostate cancer (PCa), compared with coplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy (co-VMAT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: BROAD-RT is a unique beam delivery technique, which facilitates sequential non-coplanar beam delivery without the need to rotate the couch or reposition the patient. For 15 patients with non-metastatic PCa, two different plans (BROAD-RT and co-VMAT) were created, and these plans and dosimetric indices were compared. The prescribed dose was 35 Gy in 5 fractions to the whole prostate gland, and that to the intra-prostatic dominant lesions (IPDLs) was increased up to 50 Gy. Quality assurance (QA) was performed for BROAD-RT and co-VMAT plans from the 15 patients, and the calculated and measured dose distributions were evaluated according to global gamma analysis using ArcCHECK. RESULTS: The dose coverage of the target volumes and the high-dose exposure to organs at risk (rectum, bladder, and urethra) were not significantly different between BROAD-RT and co-VMAT plans. The normal tissue dose outside of the planning target volume (PTV) (maximum dose 2 cm away from PTV [D2 cm], and 30%, 50%, or 70% isodose volume divided by the volume of PTV [R30, R50, and R70]) were significantly lower in the BROAD-RT plan (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). In QA, average (± standard deviation) passing rates were 98.2 ± 0.7% for BROAD-RT and 99.0 ± 1.0% for co-VMAT. CONCLUSION: Non-coplanar VMAT via BROAD-RT improved the dose distribution, mainly outside of the PTV and for some of the organs at risks, in prostate SBRT with focal boost compared with coplanar VMAT. Therefore, as BROAD-RT enables practical implementation of non-coplanar VMAT, it is considered a promising radiotherapy method of SBRT with focal boost for non-metastatic PCa.

Japanese Journal of Radiology
Kyoto University (JP), Kyoto University Hospital (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.