Impact of Craniofacial Scars on Psychological Status in Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between craniofacial scar severity and psychological status in patients with craniofacial scars. METHODS: This cross-sectional study enrolled adult patients with craniofacial scars. Scar severity was objectively assessed using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), while depressive and anxiety symptoms were evaluated using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), respectively. Multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to examine the associations between scar severity and psychological outcomes, adjusting for age, sex, scar etiology, scar location, time since injury, appearance-exposed occupation, prior psychological history, and previous scar treatment. RESULTS: After multivariable adjustment, higher VSS scores were significantly associated with higher PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores. Time since injury showed a negative association with both depressive and anxiety symptom scores. Other demographic and clinical variables were not significantly associated with psychological outcomes after adjustment. CONCLUSION: Greater objective severity of craniofacial scars may be associated with increased depressive and anxiety symptoms. These findings highlight the importance of psychological assessment and appropriate support in the comprehensive management of patients with craniofacial scars.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000012818
Primary Topic
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Craniofacial Scars on Psychological Status in Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study

Geng Ji, Shan Liu, Binjie Luo, Chuanjun Chen et al.
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
article

Impact of Craniofacial Scars on Psychological Status in Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study

Geng Ji, Shan Liu, Binjie Luo, Chuanjun Chen, Tian Tian
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between craniofacial scar severity and psychological status in patients with craniofacial scars. METHODS: This cross-sectional study enrolled adult patients with craniofacial scars. Scar severity was objectively assessed using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), while depressive and anxiety symptoms were evaluated using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), respectively. Multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to examine the associations between scar severity and psychological outcomes, adjusting for age, sex, scar etiology, scar location, time since injury, appearance-exposed occupation, prior psychological history, and previous scar treatment. RESULTS: After multivariable adjustment, higher VSS scores were significantly associated with higher PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores. Time since injury showed a negative association with both depressive and anxiety symptom scores. Other demographic and clinical variables were not significantly associated with psychological outcomes after adjustment. CONCLUSION: Greater objective severity of craniofacial scars may be associated with increased depressive and anxiety symptoms. These findings highlight the importance of psychological assessment and appropriate support in the comprehensive management of patients with craniofacial scars.

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Nanjing Medical University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.