DYNAMIC GEOMETRIC FLOW AND MODAL OBJECTIVITY: a critical–propositional analysis of Soumyajit Sinha's model of emergent spacetime in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of Soumyajit Chirantak Maithreyan Sinha’s A Novel Framework of Emergent Spacetime & Alternate Gravity Action in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO), developed by Vidamor Cabannas and Denivaldo Silva. The study examines Sinha’s proposal of emergent quantum spacetime from complex poles, dynamic geometric flow, conformal scaling of time, nonlinear entanglement entropy, holographic information, topological quantum field theory, and black hole informational paradoxes. The analysis argues that Sinha’s model offers a significant field of dialogue with the Theory of Objectivity because it displaces spacetime from the position of a primitive foundation and understands it as an emergent phenomenon dependent on prior geometric, relational, and informational structures. This convergence is examined in relation to the Seven Absolute Truths of the TO, its modal ontology, phenomenic elements, Inducer Effects, cosmogonic theorem, and cosmological Eras. Special attention is given to the compatibility between Sinha’s treatment of information, boundaries, horizons, and derived temporality and the TO’s claim that there is no existential universe without a substance transcendent to its quantum. Within the TO, this transcendent element is understood as knowledge or information produced in atomic relations and equivalent to atomic radiations. At the same time, the article identifies points of tension, especially the absence of an explicit modal foundation in Sinha’s model, its reliance on already highly determined mathematical structures, and the need for a more developed empirical-operational bridge. The paper concludes that Sinha’s framework establishes a strong dialogue with the Theory of Objectivity, particularly in the themes of emergent spacetime, holographic information, boundaries, black hole horizons, and the non-primitive character of time. This analytical study received analytical support from ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Denivaldo Silva; Soumyajit Sinha; emergent spacetime; dynamic geometric flow; quantum gravity; complex poles; conformal scaling; holographic information; entanglement entropy; black hole information paradox; modal ontology; Inducer Effects; phenomenic elements; substance transcendent to the quantum; atomic radiation; cosmology; cosmogony.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19931707
Primary Topic
Biofield Effects and Biophysics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DYNAMIC GEOMETRIC FLOW AND MODAL OBJECTIVITY: a critical–propositional analysis of Soumyajit Sinha's model of emergent spacetime in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Biofield Effects and Biophysics
article

DYNAMIC GEOMETRIC FLOW AND MODAL OBJECTIVITY: a critical–propositional analysis of Soumyajit Sinha's model of emergent spacetime in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas
article en

Abstract

This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of Soumyajit Chirantak Maithreyan Sinha’s A Novel Framework of Emergent Spacetime & Alternate Gravity Action in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO), developed by Vidamor Cabannas and Denivaldo Silva. The study examines Sinha’s proposal of emergent quantum spacetime from complex poles, dynamic geometric flow, conformal scaling of time, nonlinear entanglement entropy, holographic information, topological quantum field theory, and black hole informational paradoxes. The analysis argues that Sinha’s model offers a significant field of dialogue with the Theory of Objectivity because it displaces spacetime from the position of a primitive foundation and understands it as an emergent phenomenon dependent on prior geometric, relational, and informational structures. This convergence is examined in relation to the Seven Absolute Truths of the TO, its modal ontology, phenomenic elements, Inducer Effects, cosmogonic theorem, and cosmological Eras. Special attention is given to the compatibility between Sinha’s treatment of information, boundaries, horizons, and derived temporality and the TO’s claim that there is no existential universe without a substance transcendent to its quantum. Within the TO, this transcendent element is understood as knowledge or information produced in atomic relations and equivalent to atomic radiations. At the same time, the article identifies points of tension, especially the absence of an explicit modal foundation in Sinha’s model, its reliance on already highly determined mathematical structures, and the need for a more developed empirical-operational bridge. The paper concludes that Sinha’s framework establishes a strong dialogue with the Theory of Objectivity, particularly in the themes of emergent spacetime, holographic information, boundaries, black hole horizons, and the non-primitive character of time. This analytical study received analytical support from ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Denivaldo Silva; Soumyajit Sinha; emergent spacetime; dynamic geometric flow; quantum gravity; complex poles; conformal scaling; holographic information; entanglement entropy; black hole information paradox; modal ontology; Inducer Effects; phenomenic elements; substance transcendent to the quantum; atomic radiation; cosmology; cosmogony.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Biofield Effects and Biophysics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.