Jurisprudential Overview of Principle of Natural Justice in India: A Comparative Study with The Uk and The Usa

Every civilized nation irrespective of the form of government that they observe i.e., either ‘Parliamentary form or Presidential form of government, objects to secure the rights of its citizens as well as non-citizen by following the principle of ‘Rule of Law’ and not ‘Rule of Men’. The former principle prescribes three essentials first ‘Supremacy of Law’ which means no person is above the law; second ‘Equality before the law’ which means that every person is equal before the law and classification among individual would be possible only if there is reasonable ‘intelligible differentiate’; And, the third important essential is ‘Constitution is the Result of Ordinary Law’ which means that statutory provisions which are enshrined under the ordinary law are uphold by the judicial authority which ultimately results in upholding the Constitution. In essence ‘rule of law’ secures the principle of fairness by compelling every administrative, quasi-judicial or legal agency to uphold the principle of law and to treat every individual equally. However, at times the statute permits adjudicatory agencies to exercise their discretionary power and decide on their own procedure for adjudicating disputes. Such, discretion may occasionally lead to procedures that compromise the administration of justice. In these instances, the ‘doctrine of judicial review’ allows constitutional courts to intervene and determine whether the procedure employed adhere to the ‘principle of natural justice’ or not? The determination is primarily based on examination whether both sides has been given fair chance of hearing or not? And, whether the adjudicatory authority is related in any manner with the parties or matter in issue? Basically this study deals with an overview of jurisprudential aspects of the principle of natural justice and its application in Indian context along with same researcher has tried to give a blue print of comparative analysis of principle of natural justice in India vis-à-vis UK and USA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19921759
Primary Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Jurisprudential Overview of Principle of Natural Justice in India: A Comparative Study with The Uk and The Usa

Harpreet Randhawa, Santosh Kumar Tiwari
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
article

Jurisprudential Overview of Principle of Natural Justice in India: A Comparative Study with The Uk and The Usa

Harpreet Randhawa, Santosh Kumar Tiwari
article en

Abstract

Every civilized nation irrespective of the form of government that they observe i.e., either ‘Parliamentary form or Presidential form of government, objects to secure the rights of its citizens as well as non-citizen by following the principle of ‘Rule of Law’ and not ‘Rule of Men’. The former principle prescribes three essentials first ‘Supremacy of Law’ which means no person is above the law; second ‘Equality before the law’ which means that every person is equal before the law and classification among individual would be possible only if there is reasonable ‘intelligible differentiate’; And, the third important essential is ‘Constitution is the Result of Ordinary Law’ which means that statutory provisions which are enshrined under the ordinary law are uphold by the judicial authority which ultimately results in upholding the Constitution. In essence ‘rule of law’ secures the principle of fairness by compelling every administrative, quasi-judicial or legal agency to uphold the principle of law and to treat every individual equally. However, at times the statute permits adjudicatory agencies to exercise their discretionary power and decide on their own procedure for adjudicating disputes. Such, discretion may occasionally lead to procedures that compromise the administration of justice. In these instances, the ‘doctrine of judicial review’ allows constitutional courts to intervene and determine whether the procedure employed adhere to the ‘principle of natural justice’ or not? The determination is primarily based on examination whether both sides has been given fair chance of hearing or not? And, whether the adjudicatory authority is related in any manner with the parties or matter in issue? Basically this study deals with an overview of jurisprudential aspects of the principle of natural justice and its application in Indian context along with same researcher has tried to give a blue print of comparative analysis of principle of natural justice in India vis-à-vis UK and USA.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Gautam Buddha University (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.