Diagnostic utility of targeted next-generation sequencing in indeterminate pancreaticobiliary cytology and small biopsy specimens: a prospective cohort study
Pancreaticobiliary cytology is a highly specific but variably and often insufficiently sensitive diagnostic method. This study evaluated the utility of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in difficult-to-classify pancreaticobiliary specimens. A total of 136 patients were prospectively included, with cytology or small biopsy specimens from the pancreas (n = 74), extrahepatic biliary tree (n = 56), pancreatic duct (n = 4), gallbladder (n = 1), and peripancreatic lymph node (n = 1). All cases were diagnosed by cytopathologists with expertise in pancreaticobiliary (cyto)pathology using 2022 WHO Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology. Large scale pan-cancer panel was used for NGS testing. Forty-five cases (33,1%) were non-analyzable by NGS, and no genetic changes were found in 21 cases (23,1% of analyzable cases). Separate acquisition and storage of cytology/biopsy materials in RNAlater solution significantly decreased the rate of non-analyzable samples (23.3% versus 44.4%; Fisher's exact test: p = 0.0108, OR = 0.379, 95% CI 0.182-0.792). Diagnostic genetic alterations were identified in 70/91 of analyzable cases (76.9%). Suspicion was raised for the presence of germline mutation in 10 patients. Potentially druggable alterations (n = 42) were found in 36/91 patients (39,5%), including mutations in homologous recombination genes, PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, Cyclin D1-CDK4/6-Rb pathway, and potentially targetable KRAS mutations (KRAS G12D mutation occurred in 19/41 [46,3%] of KRAS-mutated tumors). Supplementing pancreaticobiliary (cyto)pathology with information from NGS increased the sensitivity for tumor diagnosis from 35.9% to 86.6% (with specificity 100%), improved negative predictive value from 14.2% to 41.2%, and enhanced overall diagnostic accuracy from 42.1% to 87.8%, respectively. In challenging cases, NGS significantly improves preoperative pancreaticobiliary diagnosis and informs clinical decision-making.
Authors
- Jiřina Pintová
- Roman Mezencev (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4361-7628)
- Luděk Bouchner
- Marián Švajdler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8052-4741)
- Kristyna Behenska
- Mihaela Farcaş
- Z Chudáček (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5927-8942)
- Magdaléna Daumová (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2241-1383)
- Petr Martínek (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0276-5771)
- Tomáš Vaněček (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5241-9723)
- Ondřej Daum (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0930-7071)
Institutions
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Charles University (CZ)
- Mulago Hospital (UG)
- University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice (CZ)
- Nemocnice Jablonec nad Nisou (CZ)
- Krajská Nemocnice Liberec (CZ)
- Biopticka Laborator (Czechia) (CZ)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin
- Published
- 2026-04-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-026-04531-0
- Primary Topic
- Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Univerzita Karlova v Praze