Long-Term Risk of Subsequent Cervical Fusion After Endoscopic Versus Open Cervical Decompression
< 0.001). In a contemporary-era sensitivity analysis (2021-2024), findings remained directionally consistent at 1 and 2 years, although statistical significance was not reached.ConclusionECD offers comparable perioperative safety and lower readmission but carries a higher long-term risk of subsequent cervical fusion, highlighting the importance of counseling patients regarding potential reoperation risk.
Authors
- Hannah Cho
- Alexander T. Hong
- Ryan Wang
- Mohammed Rasheed
- William Zeng
- Syed I Khalid
- Ankit I Mehta
Institutions
- University of Southern California (US)
- California Southern University (US)
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Rosalind Franklin Institute (GB)
- Franklin University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Global Spine Journal
- Published
- 2026-04-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682261449159
- Primary Topic
- Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00