A possible impact lull in the middle of the Eratosthenian period suggested by the Chang’e-5 and 6 missions

Context. It was generally believed that lunar impact flux over the past 3.5 billion years has been almost constant. However, there are still considerable age gaps, causing the evolution of impact flux to remain elusive. Recently, the Chang’e-5 and 6 missions collected samples from the Moon, and the respective ages of the mare basalt units containing the landing sites were dated to be 2.0 and 2.8 billion years ago (Ga). Aims. With this work, we aim to investigate the constancy of the lunar impact flux. Methods. We measured the densities of craters in both Chang’e-5 and 6 landing mare basalt units. Results. We find that the density of craters with diameters ranging from about 200 m to 1 km in the Chang’e-6 unit is almost identical to that of the Chang’e-5 unit. The density similarity suggests an impact lull (relatively few impacts on average) between 2.0 and 2.8 Ga. Consequently, the population of near-Earth objects (NEOs) is not in a quasi-steady state, with this being supported by a spike found at about 2.8-3.4 Ga. The results suggest that large, rare asteroid family-forming events in the main asteroid belt, rather than background main belt asteroids, are the main (>90 ± 2%; 1σ uncertainty) source of subhectometer NEOs. Alternatively, to be compatible with a constant flux, the strength of the Chang’e-5 mare basalt has to be about 30% lower than that of Chang’e-6.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202558759/pdf
Primary Topic
Planetary Science and Exploration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A possible impact lull in the middle of the Eratosthenian period suggested by the Chang’e-5 and 6 missions

Minggang Xie, Yan Li
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Planetary Science and Exploration
article

A possible impact lull in the middle of the Eratosthenian period suggested by the Chang’e-5 and 6 missions

Minggang Xie, Yan Li
article en

Abstract

Context. It was generally believed that lunar impact flux over the past 3.5 billion years has been almost constant. However, there are still considerable age gaps, causing the evolution of impact flux to remain elusive. Recently, the Chang’e-5 and 6 missions collected samples from the Moon, and the respective ages of the mare basalt units containing the landing sites were dated to be 2.0 and 2.8 billion years ago (Ga). Aims. With this work, we aim to investigate the constancy of the lunar impact flux. Methods. We measured the densities of craters in both Chang’e-5 and 6 landing mare basalt units. Results. We find that the density of craters with diameters ranging from about 200 m to 1 km in the Chang’e-6 unit is almost identical to that of the Chang’e-5 unit. The density similarity suggests an impact lull (relatively few impacts on average) between 2.0 and 2.8 Ga. Consequently, the population of near-Earth objects (NEOs) is not in a quasi-steady state, with this being supported by a spike found at about 2.8-3.4 Ga. The results suggest that large, rare asteroid family-forming events in the main asteroid belt, rather than background main belt asteroids, are the main (>90 ± 2%; 1σ uncertainty) source of subhectometer NEOs. Alternatively, to be compatible with a constant flux, the strength of the Chang’e-5 mare basalt has to be about 30% lower than that of Chang’e-6.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Planetary Science and Exploration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.