Hierarchical Bayesian Analysis of Suicidal Ideation Among Middle‐Aged and Older Adults in South Korea

BACKGROUND: Research on suicidal ideation has largely relied on population-average models that implicitly generalize group-level associations into individual outcomes. This study examines the extent to which risk and protective factors for suicidal ideation operate differently across individuals among middle-aged and older adults. METHODS: Data from the Korean Welfare Panel Study (2012-2024) included 2500 adults aged 51 and above. We employed hierarchical Bayesian logistic regression with an individual-specific random intercept and random slopes for time-varying predictors. Demographic characteristics (sex, age, education) accounted for part of the heterogeneity in the individual-specific coefficients, with the remaining heterogeneity captured by person-specific random effects. RESULTS: Substantial individual heterogeneity emerged in the effects of risk and protective factors on suicidal ideation. Demographic characteristics explained part of this heterogeneity. Specifically, spousal presence was more protective for men, and higher education buffered material hardship effects. Remaining heterogeneity was reflected in person-specific random slopes (sensitivity parameters), which varied substantially across individuals even after accounting for demographic characteristics. Scenario analyses demonstrated that high-sensitivity individuals experienced greater risk increases than low-sensitivity individuals under the same stressor changes across psychosocial conditions, and an illustrative case showed substantial predicted risk elevation at modest symptom levels in an individual with high depression sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the importance of shifting from group-average effects towards individualized risk stratification that accounts for individual-specific vulnerability profiles. The hierarchical Bayesian approach shows promise for generating person-specific risk estimates that may support the identification of higher-risk subgroups for targeted screening and prevention planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychogeriatrics
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/psyg.70173
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hierarchical Bayesian Analysis of Suicidal Ideation Among Middle‐Aged and Older Adults in South Korea

Kee Yeun Lee, Minyoung Kwak
Psychogeriatrics
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

Hierarchical Bayesian Analysis of Suicidal Ideation Among Middle‐Aged and Older Adults in South Korea

Kee Yeun Lee, Minyoung Kwak
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research on suicidal ideation has largely relied on population-average models that implicitly generalize group-level associations into individual outcomes. This study examines the extent to which risk and protective factors for suicidal ideation operate differently across individuals among middle-aged and older adults. METHODS: Data from the Korean Welfare Panel Study (2012-2024) included 2500 adults aged 51 and above. We employed hierarchical Bayesian logistic regression with an individual-specific random intercept and random slopes for time-varying predictors. Demographic characteristics (sex, age, education) accounted for part of the heterogeneity in the individual-specific coefficients, with the remaining heterogeneity captured by person-specific random effects. RESULTS: Substantial individual heterogeneity emerged in the effects of risk and protective factors on suicidal ideation. Demographic characteristics explained part of this heterogeneity. Specifically, spousal presence was more protective for men, and higher education buffered material hardship effects. Remaining heterogeneity was reflected in person-specific random slopes (sensitivity parameters), which varied substantially across individuals even after accounting for demographic characteristics. Scenario analyses demonstrated that high-sensitivity individuals experienced greater risk increases than low-sensitivity individuals under the same stressor changes across psychosocial conditions, and an illustrative case showed substantial predicted risk elevation at modest symptom levels in an individual with high depression sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the importance of shifting from group-average effects towards individualized risk stratification that accounts for individual-specific vulnerability profiles. The hierarchical Bayesian approach shows promise for generating person-specific risk estimates that may support the identification of higher-risk subgroups for targeted screening and prevention planning.

PsychogeriatricsVol. 26(3)
Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (KR), Daegu University (KR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.