The haunted Umwelt: a biosemiotic and hauntological account of immune semiotic corruption in field cancerization

Field cancerization, the process wherein prior insults corrupt the semiotic landscape through which immune cells detect and respond to "the other", persists even after the precipitating conditions resolve and the tissue histologically appears normal. This exemplifies a broader explanatory problem: How can we account for biomedical phenomena whose pathology is constituted by a history that standard mechanistic accounts cannot recover? I argue that a comprehensive understanding of field cancerization requires us to supplement molecular mechanistic explanations with lineage-level accounts, developed through a dialogue among Derrida's hauntology, ghost criminology, and von Uexküll's Umwelt as formalized through Peirce's triadic model of signs. This framework generates a three-ghost taxonomy of immune semiotic corruption, explains why treating the present condition without addressing historically constituted corruption fails, and suggests concrete therapeutic implications based on this framework.Keywords: field cancerization, immunology, biosemiotics, hauntology, ghost criminology, Umwelt, Derrida, Peirce.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theory in Biosciences
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-026-00496-5
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The haunted Umwelt: a biosemiotic and hauntological account of immune semiotic corruption in field cancerization

Anuraag Bukkuri
Theory in Biosciences
Philosophy and History of Science
article

The haunted Umwelt: a biosemiotic and hauntological account of immune semiotic corruption in field cancerization

Anuraag Bukkuri
article en

Abstract

Field cancerization, the process wherein prior insults corrupt the semiotic landscape through which immune cells detect and respond to "the other", persists even after the precipitating conditions resolve and the tissue histologically appears normal. This exemplifies a broader explanatory problem: How can we account for biomedical phenomena whose pathology is constituted by a history that standard mechanistic accounts cannot recover? I argue that a comprehensive understanding of field cancerization requires us to supplement molecular mechanistic explanations with lineage-level accounts, developed through a dialogue among Derrida's hauntology, ghost criminology, and von Uexküll's Umwelt as formalized through Peirce's triadic model of signs. This framework generates a three-ghost taxonomy of immune semiotic corruption, explains why treating the present condition without addressing historically constituted corruption fails, and suggests concrete therapeutic implications based on this framework.Keywords: field cancerization, immunology, biosemiotics, hauntology, ghost criminology, Umwelt, Derrida, Peirce.

Theory in BiosciencesVol. 145(4)
City, University of London (GB), City St George's, University of London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Philosophy and History of Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.