Federated Illusion: Multi-Level Geometric Privacy Audit for Federated Graph Unlearning

Machine unlearning in federated graph learning must satisfy the multi-level indistinguishability requirement of the deletion of a target node being undetectable at the level of the global model, of the unlearning client’s local model, and of every non-target client’s local model. Approximate unlearning methods that pass confidence-based audits may still leave geometric traces through embedding drift at one or more of these K+1 levels. We formalize this requirement, introduce a five-model threat taxonomy, and extend the Hub–Ripple embedding drift audit to global, local, and cross-client levels. Across 31,900 trials spanning five graph benchmarks, five federated unlearning methods, and four supplementary ablations (K-value, cross-edge handling, control sampling, and DP-SGD defense), we find that all approximate methods fail the following multi-level requirement: the Confidence–Embedding Gap persists at 0.12 (versus 0.35 centralized), cross-client leakage correlates with shared cross-edge count (r=0.56, p<10−160), and a federated participant outperforms a white-box external auditor (AUC 0.83 versus 0.81). Client-level unlearning is more detectable at the global level than node-level unlearning (AUC 0.81 versus 0.77), contradicting the intuition that coarser deletion yields stronger privacy. FedRetrain satisfies global and local indistinguishability but exhibits residual cross-client leakage (Cross-Mean L2 AUC =0.62±0.04) because re-aggregation itself perturbs the global parameter vector. No method evaluated achieves full multi-level indistinguishability. Supplementary studies confirm that this is a structural property of FedAvg; DP-SGD reduces Cross L2 AUC by only 0.013 at the cost of a 79% accuracy drop, and FedSage-like neighbor sharing does not change the leakage profile. Multi-level geometric auditing, spanning all K+1 models, is the necessary evaluation floor that any method claiming verifiable privacy compliance must satisfy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/info17050424
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Federated Illusion: Multi-Level Geometric Privacy Audit for Federated Graph Unlearning

Junjie Pang, Haoke Han, Zhenzhen Xie, Yan Huang
Information
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
article

Federated Illusion: Multi-Level Geometric Privacy Audit for Federated Graph Unlearning

Junjie Pang, Haoke Han, Zhenzhen Xie, Yan Huang
article en

Abstract

Machine unlearning in federated graph learning must satisfy the multi-level indistinguishability requirement of the deletion of a target node being undetectable at the level of the global model, of the unlearning client’s local model, and of every non-target client’s local model. Approximate unlearning methods that pass confidence-based audits may still leave geometric traces through embedding drift at one or more of these K+1 levels. We formalize this requirement, introduce a five-model threat taxonomy, and extend the Hub–Ripple embedding drift audit to global, local, and cross-client levels. Across 31,900 trials spanning five graph benchmarks, five federated unlearning methods, and four supplementary ablations (K-value, cross-edge handling, control sampling, and DP-SGD defense), we find that all approximate methods fail the following multi-level requirement: the Confidence–Embedding Gap persists at 0.12 (versus 0.35 centralized), cross-client leakage correlates with shared cross-edge count (r=0.56, p<10−160), and a federated participant outperforms a white-box external auditor (AUC 0.83 versus 0.81). Client-level unlearning is more detectable at the global level than node-level unlearning (AUC 0.81 versus 0.77), contradicting the intuition that coarser deletion yields stronger privacy. FedRetrain satisfies global and local indistinguishability but exhibits residual cross-client leakage (Cross-Mean L2 AUC =0.62±0.04) because re-aggregation itself perturbs the global parameter vector. No method evaluated achieves full multi-level indistinguishability. Supplementary studies confirm that this is a structural property of FedAvg; DP-SGD reduces Cross L2 AUC by only 0.013 at the cost of a 79% accuracy drop, and FedSage-like neighbor sharing does not change the leakage profile. Multi-level geometric auditing, spanning all K+1 models, is the necessary evaluation floor that any method claiming verifiable privacy compliance must satisfy.

InformationVol. 17(5)
Qingdao University of Science and Technology (CN), Kennesaw State University (US), Shandong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.