Supporting postgraduate students’ engagement: an Activity Theory analysis of the impact of a co-designed assessment

Collaborative design (co-design) of assessments between teachers and students has been shown to enhance student engagement. This study investigates how students in a postgraduate project management programme at an Irish university participated in the co-design of a module assessment and engaged in the co-designed assessment, exploring how the dynamics of shared leadership, authentic assessment, and student engagement and partnership shaped their learning experience. Using Activity Theory and the related notion of expansive learning, and drawing on interview and survey data, the study analyses the module leader and students’ co-design of assessment and students’ engagement in the co-designed assessment. It reveals how the co-design process enabled participants to address systemic contradictions in earlier assessment approaches and suggests ways in which contradictions in the co-designed approach may be overcome. The findings highlight the importance of relationship-building in group environments and the value of co-design, using a variety of technologies, in establishing trust and developing effective and authentic assessments. They also indicate that different group formation approaches can impact the quality of peer interactions and the depth of student learning.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)
Published
2026-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34961/19388
Primary Topic
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supporting postgraduate students’ engagement: an Activity Theory analysis of the impact of a co-designed assessment

Dave Gatrell, Sandra Flynn
University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
article

Supporting postgraduate students’ engagement: an Activity Theory analysis of the impact of a co-designed assessment

Dave Gatrell, Sandra Flynn
article en

Abstract

Collaborative design (co-design) of assessments between teachers and students has been shown to enhance student engagement. This study investigates how students in a postgraduate project management programme at an Irish university participated in the co-design of a module assessment and engaged in the co-designed assessment, exploring how the dynamics of shared leadership, authentic assessment, and student engagement and partnership shaped their learning experience. Using Activity Theory and the related notion of expansive learning, and drawing on interview and survey data, the study analyses the module leader and students’ co-design of assessment and students’ engagement in the co-designed assessment. It reveals how the co-design process enabled participants to address systemic contradictions in earlier assessment approaches and suggests ways in which contradictions in the co-designed approach may be overcome. The findings highlight the importance of relationship-building in group environments and the value of co-design, using a variety of technologies, in establishing trust and developing effective and authentic assessments. They also indicate that different group formation approaches can impact the quality of peer interactions and the depth of student learning.

University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.