A Review of the Structure of Free-Space Optical Channel Models: Physical Meaning, Assumptions, and Atmospheric Conditions

Free-space optical (FSO) communication is an attractive high-capacity wireless technology for terrestrial, aerial, and satellite links. However, FSO performance is strongly affected by multiple impairments, including path loss, turbulence attenuation, pointing errors, and equipment loss. Therefore, accurate performance evaluation requires channel modelling that accounts for both deterministic power losses and stochastic channel effects. This paper presents a comprehensive and structured review of FSO channel modelling, covering the transmission, propagation medium, and receiver sections. The composite channel response is represented using a mathematical formulation. Commonly used FSO models are reviewed and organised, including Beer–Lambert and geometrical loss, Kim and Kruse path loss models, Lognormal, Gamma–Gamma, K, and Málaga distributions, along with pointing-error and angle-of-arrival models. Each model is explained in terms of its physical meaning, assumptions, and applicable operating conditions. Lastly, a numerical example is presented to demonstrate how deterministic losses and stochastic channel effects can be combined in FSO performance evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Photonics
Published
2026-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics13050425
Primary Topic
Optical Wireless Communication Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Review of the Structure of Free-Space Optical Channel Models: Physical Meaning, Assumptions, and Atmospheric Conditions

Hakilo Sabit, Sabai Phuchortham
Photonics
Optical Wireless Communication Technologies
article

A Review of the Structure of Free-Space Optical Channel Models: Physical Meaning, Assumptions, and Atmospheric Conditions

Hakilo Sabit, Sabai Phuchortham
article en

Abstract

Free-space optical (FSO) communication is an attractive high-capacity wireless technology for terrestrial, aerial, and satellite links. However, FSO performance is strongly affected by multiple impairments, including path loss, turbulence attenuation, pointing errors, and equipment loss. Therefore, accurate performance evaluation requires channel modelling that accounts for both deterministic power losses and stochastic channel effects. This paper presents a comprehensive and structured review of FSO channel modelling, covering the transmission, propagation medium, and receiver sections. The composite channel response is represented using a mathematical formulation. Commonly used FSO models are reviewed and organised, including Beer–Lambert and geometrical loss, Kim and Kruse path loss models, Lognormal, Gamma–Gamma, K, and Málaga distributions, along with pointing-error and angle-of-arrival models. Each model is explained in terms of its physical meaning, assumptions, and applicable operating conditions. Lastly, a numerical example is presented to demonstrate how deterministic losses and stochastic channel effects can be combined in FSO performance evaluation.

PhotonicsVol. 13(5)
Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Optical Wireless Communication Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Review of the Structure of Free-Space Optical Channel Models: Physical Meaning, Assumptions, and Atmospheric Conditions — Hakilo Sabit, Sabai Phuchortham · Photonics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS