A Comparative Thermodynamic Screening Framework for Evaluating Waste-Derived Raw Meals in Low-Temperature Clinker Production

This study proposes a comparative screening framework for evaluating the feasibility of low-temperature clinker production using waste-derived raw meals. The framework integrates compositional compatibility, process conditions, clinker-formation indicators, melt-related constraints, and cement performance into a unified four-stage evaluation logic. A secondary-data analysis was conducted using three benchmark sources representing waste-derived substitution, mineralizer-assisted reduced-temperature clinker formation, and thermodynamic screening. The results show that MSWI bottom ash remains compositionally feasible only up to approximately 12.4 wt.% substitution, primarily limited by Fe2O3 content. In the mineralizer benchmark, clinker produced at 1350 °C with 0.067 wt.% F and 2.2 wt.% SO3 exhibited burnability and performance comparable to a 1450 °C reference, whereas further reduction to 1300 °C required 0.270 wt.% F and resulted in reduced density, delayed setting, and lower compressive strength. These results demonstrate that reduced-temperature clinker feasibility depends not only on temperature reduction but also on compositional balance and melt-phase behavior. The proposed framework enables classification of candidate systems as favorable, conditionally feasible, or constrained prior to experimental validation and can serve as a preliminary decision-support tool for waste-derived clinker design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16094244
Primary Topic
Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Thermodynamic Screening Framework for Evaluating Waste-Derived Raw Meals in Low-Temperature Clinker Production

JD Bang, Bilguun Mend, Yong-Sik Chu
Applied Sciences
Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
article

A Comparative Thermodynamic Screening Framework for Evaluating Waste-Derived Raw Meals in Low-Temperature Clinker Production

JD Bang, Bilguun Mend, Yong-Sik Chu
article en

Abstract

This study proposes a comparative screening framework for evaluating the feasibility of low-temperature clinker production using waste-derived raw meals. The framework integrates compositional compatibility, process conditions, clinker-formation indicators, melt-related constraints, and cement performance into a unified four-stage evaluation logic. A secondary-data analysis was conducted using three benchmark sources representing waste-derived substitution, mineralizer-assisted reduced-temperature clinker formation, and thermodynamic screening. The results show that MSWI bottom ash remains compositionally feasible only up to approximately 12.4 wt.% substitution, primarily limited by Fe2O3 content. In the mineralizer benchmark, clinker produced at 1350 °C with 0.067 wt.% F and 2.2 wt.% SO3 exhibited burnability and performance comparable to a 1450 °C reference, whereas further reduction to 1300 °C required 0.270 wt.% F and resulted in reduced density, delayed setting, and lower compressive strength. These results demonstrate that reduced-temperature clinker feasibility depends not only on temperature reduction but also on compositional balance and melt-phase behavior. The proposed framework enables classification of candidate systems as favorable, conditionally feasible, or constrained prior to experimental validation and can serve as a preliminary decision-support tool for waste-derived clinker design.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(9)
Korea Institute of Ceramic Engineering and Technology (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.