Are Machine Learning Models Superior to Logistic Regression Models to Predict 30-d Mortality Post-Hip Fracture Surgery?

Abstract Hip fractures represent a significant global health burden, with high mortality rates. Accurate prediction of 30-d postoperative mortality is instrumental to optimize patient care. This study aimed to validate previously developed logistic regression and machine learning (ML) models for predicting 30-d mortality after hip fracture surgery measured from the date of the index operation (counting deaths occurring in-hospital or within 30 d after surgery) and compare their performance against one established calculator. We included 47 276 patients aged ≥65 yr who underwent hip fracture surgery, excluding cancer, atypical, pathologic, and stress fractures. We applied previously derived logistic regression and ML equations from the 2011-2017 NSQIP dataset, to the updated 2018-2020 dataset. We developed 2 models for each, one derived on admission and one taking into account operative course. For each of these models we also developed a full model and a parsimonious counterpart. We assessed discrimination using the Area Under the Curve (AUC) metric. We compared AUCs for models with the DeLong test. We developed an online calculator for our most highly performing model. We also benchmarked our preoperative logistic and ML calculators against a previously published preoperative model. The logistic models demonstrated acceptable to good discrimination with AUCs as follows: preoperative full of 0.756; preoperative parsimonious of 0.748; Postoperative full of 0.829; Postoperative parsimonious of 0.817. ML models maintained good discrimination performance: preoperative full, 0.772; preoperative parsimonious, 0.751; Postoperative full, 0.865; Postoperative parsimonious, 0.838. ML models were slightly superior to logistic regression models. A previously published model by Harris et al. had more variables and demonstrated no significant superiority. Both logistic regression and ML approaches offer clinically useful predictions for 30-d mortality after hip fracture surgery. Prospective validation in other populations and then integration of the parsimonious models into clinical practice may enhance perioperative decision-making and possibly patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JBMR Plus
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmrpl/ziag079
Primary Topic
Hip and Femur Fractures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are Machine Learning Models Superior to Logistic Regression Models to Predict 30-d Mortality Post-Hip Fracture Surgery?

Caline Rhayem, Ryan Yammine, Rachid Haidar, Ghada El‐Hajj Fuleihan et al.
JBMR Plus
Hip and Femur Fractures
article

Are Machine Learning Models Superior to Logistic Regression Models to Predict 30-d Mortality Post-Hip Fracture Surgery?

Caline Rhayem, Ryan Yammine, Rachid Haidar, Ghada El‐Hajj Fuleihan, Fouad Trad, Aya Ghosn, Joudie Alwan, Hani Tamim, Ali Chehab, Zeinab Issa
article en

Abstract

Abstract Hip fractures represent a significant global health burden, with high mortality rates. Accurate prediction of 30-d postoperative mortality is instrumental to optimize patient care. This study aimed to validate previously developed logistic regression and machine learning (ML) models for predicting 30-d mortality after hip fracture surgery measured from the date of the index operation (counting deaths occurring in-hospital or within 30 d after surgery) and compare their performance against one established calculator. We included 47 276 patients aged ≥65 yr who underwent hip fracture surgery, excluding cancer, atypical, pathologic, and stress fractures. We applied previously derived logistic regression and ML equations from the 2011-2017 NSQIP dataset, to the updated 2018-2020 dataset. We developed 2 models for each, one derived on admission and one taking into account operative course. For each of these models we also developed a full model and a parsimonious counterpart. We assessed discrimination using the Area Under the Curve (AUC) metric. We compared AUCs for models with the DeLong test. We developed an online calculator for our most highly performing model. We also benchmarked our preoperative logistic and ML calculators against a previously published preoperative model. The logistic models demonstrated acceptable to good discrimination with AUCs as follows: preoperative full of 0.756; preoperative parsimonious of 0.748; Postoperative full of 0.829; Postoperative parsimonious of 0.817. ML models maintained good discrimination performance: preoperative full, 0.772; preoperative parsimonious, 0.751; Postoperative full, 0.865; Postoperative parsimonious, 0.838. ML models were slightly superior to logistic regression models. A previously published model by Harris et al. had more variables and demonstrated no significant superiority. Both logistic regression and ML approaches offer clinically useful predictions for 30-d mortality after hip fracture surgery. Prospective validation in other populations and then integration of the parsimonious models into clinical practice may enhance perioperative decision-making and possibly patient outcomes.

JBMR Plus
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Alfaisal University (SA), American University of Beirut Medical Center (LB), Children's Hospital of Michigan (US), Lebanese American University (LB), American University of Beirut (LB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Hip and Femur Fractures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.