Patterns of diagnostic errors using hierarchical cluster analysis: a single-center, cross-sectional study in general internal medicine

OBJECTIVES: Diagnostic errors are caused by disease complexity, variable settings in which care is provided, and multiple cognitive and system-level factors. However, whether outpatient diagnostic errors aggregate into specific failure modes that align with the clinical context remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to explore these modes by examining the salient causes of unexpected readmission. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study to analyze unexpected readmissions among outpatients in general internal medicine who visited a clinic within 14 days of their initial visit. Two physicians independently assessed the diagnostic errors using the Revised Safer Dx Instrument and Diagnostic Error Evaluation and Research (DEER) taxonomy. We applied hierarchical clustering to the DEER taxonomy and conducted Fisher's exact tests to examine the associations with patient, physician, and system factors (presence of a referral letter, personal protective equipment [PPE] use, and late session). RESULTS: Among the 146 patients, 50 (34.2 %) experienced diagnostic errors. Cluster analysis revealed two main categories of failure modes: (1) diagnostic prioritization and urgency appraisal failure, and (2) information acquisition and synthesis failure. The latter category was further divided into three clinically relevant subtypes: data-gathering failure, where PPE use was more common; information synthesis and interpretation failure, in which referral letters were more common; and undertesting and safety-netting failure. CONCLUSIONS: We identified that diagnostic errors were divided into four diagnostic failure modes that mapped to distinct DEER failure patterns and other factors. Linking these failure modes to measurable contextual variables may provide targets for diagnostic safety programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnosis
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2025-0190
Primary Topic
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patterns of diagnostic errors using hierarchical cluster analysis: a single-center, cross-sectional study in general internal medicine

Kuniyoshi Hayashi, Gautam A. Deshpande, Yasuhiro Osugi, Toshinori Nishizawa et al.
Diagnosis
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
article

Patterns of diagnostic errors using hierarchical cluster analysis: a single-center, cross-sectional study in general internal medicine

Kuniyoshi Hayashi, Gautam A. Deshpande, Yasuhiro Osugi, Toshinori Nishizawa, Hiroko Arioka, Takashi Watari, Yukinori Harada, Hiroki Ozawa, Yuya Suzuki, Taro Shimizu, Madoka Sakurai
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Diagnostic errors are caused by disease complexity, variable settings in which care is provided, and multiple cognitive and system-level factors. However, whether outpatient diagnostic errors aggregate into specific failure modes that align with the clinical context remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to explore these modes by examining the salient causes of unexpected readmission. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study to analyze unexpected readmissions among outpatients in general internal medicine who visited a clinic within 14 days of their initial visit. Two physicians independently assessed the diagnostic errors using the Revised Safer Dx Instrument and Diagnostic Error Evaluation and Research (DEER) taxonomy. We applied hierarchical clustering to the DEER taxonomy and conducted Fisher's exact tests to examine the associations with patient, physician, and system factors (presence of a referral letter, personal protective equipment [PPE] use, and late session). RESULTS: Among the 146 patients, 50 (34.2 %) experienced diagnostic errors. Cluster analysis revealed two main categories of failure modes: (1) diagnostic prioritization and urgency appraisal failure, and (2) information acquisition and synthesis failure. The latter category was further divided into three clinically relevant subtypes: data-gathering failure, where PPE use was more common; information synthesis and interpretation failure, in which referral letters were more common; and undertesting and safety-netting failure. CONCLUSIONS: We identified that diagnostic errors were divided into four diagnostic failure modes that mapped to distinct DEER failure patterns and other factors. Linking these failure modes to measurable contextual variables may provide targets for diagnostic safety programs.

Diagnosis
Fujita Health University (JP), Kyoto Women's University (JP), Juntendo University (JP), St. Luke's International Hospital (JP), Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Public Health (JP), Kyoto University Hospital (JP), Dokkyo Medical University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.