Reframing clinical appropriateness and professional responsibility in italian primary care: institutional data and systemic tensions

This conference paper presents a qualitative and systems-oriented analysis of the IX Regional Congress of the Italian Federation of General Practitioners (FIMMG), focusing on the evolving role of primary care within contemporary healthcare governance. The study explores four key thematic domains emerging from the congress proceedings: prescriptive appropriateness, digital governance and access to care, professional liability, and the juridical role of clinical guidelines. These themes are contextualized through official institutional data from Italian and international sources, including AIFA, ISTAT, Agenas, OECD, WHO, and ECDC. Moving beyond a descriptive report, the paper proposes a conceptual reframing of primary care as a complex adaptive system, positioned at the intersection of financial sustainability, medico-legal accountability, professional autonomy, and infrastructural capacity. Within this framework, the tensions observed in clinical practice are interpreted as emergent properties of interacting governance pressures rather than isolated operational issues. The analysis highlights a structural paradox at the core of modern healthcare systems: the coexistence of personalized, patient-centered care with increasingly standardized, indicator-driven governance models. It further examines how digital transformation, legal frameworks, and prescribing controls influence physician behavior, potentially generating phenomena such as defensive medicine, administrative role drift, and guideline over-reliance. By integrating thematic analysis with institutional evidence and complexity theory, this work contributes to the field of Health Policy and Primary Care Governance, offering a systemic interpretation of current challenges in publicly funded healthcare systems. The paper is intended for researchers, clinicians, and policymakers interested in primary care reform, healthcare governance, and the application of systems thinking to medical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19680848
Primary Topic
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reframing clinical appropriateness and professional responsibility in italian primary care: institutional data and systemic tensions

Ombretta Papa, Pier Luigi Bartoletti, Filippo Anelli, Michele Treglia et al.
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
article

Reframing clinical appropriateness and professional responsibility in italian primary care: institutional data and systemic tensions

Ombretta Papa, Pier Luigi Bartoletti, Filippo Anelli, Michele Treglia, Maria Corongiu, Giovanni Cirilli, Domenico Carpita, Alberto Chiaratti
article en

Abstract

This conference paper presents a qualitative and systems-oriented analysis of the IX Regional Congress of the Italian Federation of General Practitioners (FIMMG), focusing on the evolving role of primary care within contemporary healthcare governance. The study explores four key thematic domains emerging from the congress proceedings: prescriptive appropriateness, digital governance and access to care, professional liability, and the juridical role of clinical guidelines. These themes are contextualized through official institutional data from Italian and international sources, including AIFA, ISTAT, Agenas, OECD, WHO, and ECDC. Moving beyond a descriptive report, the paper proposes a conceptual reframing of primary care as a complex adaptive system, positioned at the intersection of financial sustainability, medico-legal accountability, professional autonomy, and infrastructural capacity. Within this framework, the tensions observed in clinical practice are interpreted as emergent properties of interacting governance pressures rather than isolated operational issues. The analysis highlights a structural paradox at the core of modern healthcare systems: the coexistence of personalized, patient-centered care with increasingly standardized, indicator-driven governance models. It further examines how digital transformation, legal frameworks, and prescribing controls influence physician behavior, potentially generating phenomena such as defensive medicine, administrative role drift, and guideline over-reliance. By integrating thematic analysis with institutional evidence and complexity theory, this work contributes to the field of Health Policy and Primary Care Governance, offering a systemic interpretation of current challenges in publicly funded healthcare systems. The paper is intended for researchers, clinicians, and policymakers interested in primary care reform, healthcare governance, and the application of systems thinking to medical practice.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), International Federation of Surveyors (DK), Federazione Medico Sportiva Italiana (IT), Società Italiana di Medicina Generale (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.