EFFECT OF BLOOD CONTAMINATION USING SELF-ETCHING SELF-ADHESIVE FLOWABLE COMPOSITE AND NANOHYBRID COMPOSITE ON THE SHEAR BOND STRENGTH TO DENTIN – AN IN-VITRO STUDY

Background: Shear bond strength (SBS) is a key factor in the success of restorative materials, reflecting their adhesion to dentin. Blood contamination can interfere with resin infiltration and compromise bonding. Self-etching self-adhesive flowable composites offer ease of application, while nanohybrid composites provide superior mechanical properties. Comparing their SBS under uncontaminated and contaminated conditions helps assess their clinical performance. Aim: To compare and evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of self-etching self-adhesive flowable composite and nanohybrid composite to dentin under uncontaminated conditions and after contamination with blood. Materials and Methods: Sixty extracted human premolars were prepared with standardized Class V cavities and divided into two groups: uncontaminated, and blood-contaminated. Each group was subdivided into two subgroups (n = 15): self-etching self-adhesive composite and nanohybrid composite. SBS was measured using a universal testing machine. Data were analysed using independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, two-way ANOVA, Tukey post-hoc test, and Levene’s test. Results: Under uncontaminated conditions, nanohybrid composite showed significantly higher SBS than self-etch composite (p < 0.001). Blood contamination caused the greatest reduction in SBS, with self-etch composite performing significantly better than nanohybrid composite (p < 0.001). Significant differences were observed among subgroups and between factors (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Nanohybrid composite performs best under ideal conditions, while self-etch composite shows greater resistance to contamination. Blood contamination has the most detrimental effect on dentin bonding.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19885092
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EFFECT OF BLOOD CONTAMINATION USING SELF-ETCHING SELF-ADHESIVE FLOWABLE COMPOSITE AND NANOHYBRID COMPOSITE ON THE SHEAR BOND STRENGTH TO DENTIN – AN IN-VITRO STUDY

1*Dr. Harshita Karwatkar, 2Dr. Vartul Dwivedi, 3Dr. Sanjeev Kumar Tyagi, 4Dr. Diya Gilla, 5Dr. Pratibha Mishra, 6Dr. Ushma Sharma
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Dental materials and restorations
article

EFFECT OF BLOOD CONTAMINATION USING SELF-ETCHING SELF-ADHESIVE FLOWABLE COMPOSITE AND NANOHYBRID COMPOSITE ON THE SHEAR BOND STRENGTH TO DENTIN – AN IN-VITRO STUDY

1*Dr. Harshita Karwatkar, 2Dr. Vartul Dwivedi, 3Dr. Sanjeev Kumar Tyagi, 4Dr. Diya Gilla, 5Dr. Pratibha Mishra, 6Dr. Ushma Sharma
article en

Abstract

Background: Shear bond strength (SBS) is a key factor in the success of restorative materials, reflecting their adhesion to dentin. Blood contamination can interfere with resin infiltration and compromise bonding. Self-etching self-adhesive flowable composites offer ease of application, while nanohybrid composites provide superior mechanical properties. Comparing their SBS under uncontaminated and contaminated conditions helps assess their clinical performance. Aim: To compare and evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of self-etching self-adhesive flowable composite and nanohybrid composite to dentin under uncontaminated conditions and after contamination with blood. Materials and Methods: Sixty extracted human premolars were prepared with standardized Class V cavities and divided into two groups: uncontaminated, and blood-contaminated. Each group was subdivided into two subgroups (n = 15): self-etching self-adhesive composite and nanohybrid composite. SBS was measured using a universal testing machine. Data were analysed using independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, two-way ANOVA, Tukey post-hoc test, and Levene’s test. Results: Under uncontaminated conditions, nanohybrid composite showed significantly higher SBS than self-etch composite (p < 0.001). Blood contamination caused the greatest reduction in SBS, with self-etch composite performing significantly better than nanohybrid composite (p < 0.001). Significant differences were observed among subgroups and between factors (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Nanohybrid composite performs best under ideal conditions, while self-etch composite shows greater resistance to contamination. Blood contamination has the most detrimental effect on dentin bonding.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.