Can Resistance Training Prevent Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) affects quality of life (QoL) and increases healthcare costs. Resistance training (RT) is proposed as a preventive strategy, although its safety and effectiveness remain uncertain. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of RT in preventing BCRL in women at risk. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, PEDro, and LILACS databases were searched from their inception to January 2025, along with the gray literature, trial registries, and preprints. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2, and certainty of the evidence (CoE) was assessed using GRADE. Primary outcomes were the occurrence of lymphedema and overall QoL; secondary outcomes included pain, upper limb function, range of motion (ROM), grip strength, and adverse events. Results: Eight RCTs (n = 1131) were included. The effects of RT on lymphedema and arm volume are very uncertain (very low CoE). For QoL, pain, ROM, and grip strength, the findings were inconsistent and uncertain (low to very low CoE). Adverse events were mild and transient, with no serious complications. Conclusion: RT is probably safe in women at risk of developing BCRL. Its preventive effectiveness is highly uncertain. Well-designed RCTs with standardized diagnostic criteria, patient-centered outcomes, and long-term follow-up are needed to establish their role in BCRL prevention with greater certainty. Ethics and dissemination: This study did not require ethical approval. The results will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and academic presentations. Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42023455720).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15093297
Primary Topic
Lymphatic System and Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Resistance Training Prevent Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

X Bonfill, Carlos Zaror, Héctor Fuentes-Barría, Naira Figueiredo Deana et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Lymphatic System and Diseases
article

Can Resistance Training Prevent Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

X Bonfill, Carlos Zaror, Héctor Fuentes-Barría, Naira Figueiredo Deana, Olga Patricia López, Pamela Serón S, Raul Alberto Aguilera-Eguía, Ángel Roco-Videla, Mariana Melo-Lonconao, Barbara Burgos Mansilla, Ruvistay Gutiérrez-Arias
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) affects quality of life (QoL) and increases healthcare costs. Resistance training (RT) is proposed as a preventive strategy, although its safety and effectiveness remain uncertain. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of RT in preventing BCRL in women at risk. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, PEDro, and LILACS databases were searched from their inception to January 2025, along with the gray literature, trial registries, and preprints. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2, and certainty of the evidence (CoE) was assessed using GRADE. Primary outcomes were the occurrence of lymphedema and overall QoL; secondary outcomes included pain, upper limb function, range of motion (ROM), grip strength, and adverse events. Results: Eight RCTs (n = 1131) were included. The effects of RT on lymphedema and arm volume are very uncertain (very low CoE). For QoL, pain, ROM, and grip strength, the findings were inconsistent and uncertain (low to very low CoE). Adverse events were mild and transient, with no serious complications. Conclusion: RT is probably safe in women at risk of developing BCRL. Its preventive effectiveness is highly uncertain. Well-designed RCTs with standardized diagnostic criteria, patient-centered outcomes, and long-term follow-up are needed to establish their role in BCRL prevention with greater certainty. Ethics and dissemination: This study did not require ethical approval. The results will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and academic presentations. Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42023455720).

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(9)
Universidad de La Frontera (CL), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Universidad Andrés Bello (CL), Hospital de Sant Pau (ES), Universidad Autónoma de Chile (CL), San Sebastián University (CL), Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción (CL), Universidad Autonoma de Manizales (CO), Instituto Nacional del Tórax (CL), Biomedical Research Institute (US), Agencia de Salud Pública de Barcelona (ES), Arturo Prat University (CL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Lymphatic System and Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.