Complications and Patient Satisfaction After Endoscopic Radial Artery Harvest: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to assess complications after endoscopic radial artery harvest, evaluate patient satisfaction, and assess the feasibility of a questionnaire interview. The primary aim was to assess neurological damage after endoscopic radial artery harvest (ERAH), and the secondary aim was to assess the feasibility of a newly constructed questionnaire in Danish. Methods: From June 2010 through October 2012, 108 patients underwent endoscopic radial artery harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at our institution. A total of 100 patients were interviewed by phone between one and two years after the operation. The interviews included questions about infection, bleeding, neurological damage, vascular perfusion of the hand, re-intervention, and general satisfaction with the procedure. Results: The described cohort was mainly male (88.9% 95% confidence interval (CI) 90.5–98.4%) with a mean age of 60.8 years (standard deviation (SD) 9.0). The self-reported incidence of postoperative antibiotic treatment was 7.0% (95% CI 3.1–14.4%), sensory deficit 18.0% (95% CI 11.3–27.2%), pain 8.0% (95% CI 3.8–15.6%), motoric deficit 4.0% (95% CI 1.3–10.5%) and cold or pale fingers 9.0% (95% CI 4.5–16.8%). At a follow-up time with a mean of 1.40 years (range 0.97–2.37 years, SD 0.36), all incisions were healed satisfactorily, 12.0% (95% CI 6.6–20.4%) reported sensory deficit, 7.0% (95% CI 3.1–14.4%) reported pain, 2.0% (95% CI 0.3–7.7%) reported motoric deficit, and none had a tendency towards cold fingers. The mean duration of antibiotic treatment was 8.7 days ± 2.3. When asked to rate the endoscopic procedure points of satisfaction from 0 (worst) to 10 (best), the mean was 9.7 ± 0.7. Conclusions: This study reports the occurrence of surgical complications immediately after ERAH, with an occurrence of self-reported neurological deficits of 18%. A questionnaire was feasible in a cohort of postoperative patients receiving radial artery harvest.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15093338
Primary Topic
Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Complications and Patient Satisfaction After Endoscopic Radial Artery Harvest: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Janus Christian Jakobsen, Christian L. Carranza, Louise Uth
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
article

Complications and Patient Satisfaction After Endoscopic Radial Artery Harvest: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Janus Christian Jakobsen, Christian L. Carranza, Louise Uth
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to assess complications after endoscopic radial artery harvest, evaluate patient satisfaction, and assess the feasibility of a questionnaire interview. The primary aim was to assess neurological damage after endoscopic radial artery harvest (ERAH), and the secondary aim was to assess the feasibility of a newly constructed questionnaire in Danish. Methods: From June 2010 through October 2012, 108 patients underwent endoscopic radial artery harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at our institution. A total of 100 patients were interviewed by phone between one and two years after the operation. The interviews included questions about infection, bleeding, neurological damage, vascular perfusion of the hand, re-intervention, and general satisfaction with the procedure. Results: The described cohort was mainly male (88.9% 95% confidence interval (CI) 90.5–98.4%) with a mean age of 60.8 years (standard deviation (SD) 9.0). The self-reported incidence of postoperative antibiotic treatment was 7.0% (95% CI 3.1–14.4%), sensory deficit 18.0% (95% CI 11.3–27.2%), pain 8.0% (95% CI 3.8–15.6%), motoric deficit 4.0% (95% CI 1.3–10.5%) and cold or pale fingers 9.0% (95% CI 4.5–16.8%). At a follow-up time with a mean of 1.40 years (range 0.97–2.37 years, SD 0.36), all incisions were healed satisfactorily, 12.0% (95% CI 6.6–20.4%) reported sensory deficit, 7.0% (95% CI 3.1–14.4%) reported pain, 2.0% (95% CI 0.3–7.7%) reported motoric deficit, and none had a tendency towards cold fingers. The mean duration of antibiotic treatment was 8.7 days ± 2.3. When asked to rate the endoscopic procedure points of satisfaction from 0 (worst) to 10 (best), the mean was 9.7 ± 0.7. Conclusions: This study reports the occurrence of surgical complications immediately after ERAH, with an occurrence of self-reported neurological deficits of 18%. A questionnaire was feasible in a cohort of postoperative patients receiving radial artery harvest.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(9)
University of Southern Denmark (DK), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.