A Comparative Review of Biological, Electrochemical, and Membrane-Based Methods for Direct Ocean Carbon Capture

Direct ocean carbon capture (DOC) has emerged as a promising strategy for mitigating atmospheric CO2 levels and addressing ocean acidification. Unlike direct air carbon capture methods, DOC leverages the ocean’s vast carbon storage capacity, offering a scalable and efficient route for carbon dioxide removal. This systematic comparative review categorizes existing DOC methods into three types: (1) biological carbon capture, which relies on photosynthesis by microalgae and marine microorganisms; (2) electrochemical carbon capture, which utilizes water electrolysis to generate H+ and OH− ions for pH-driven CO2 removal; and (3) physical carbon capture, which employs hollow fiber membranes to directly separate CO2 from seawater. For each technology, we evaluate efficiency, energy consumption, cost, technology readiness level (TRL), scalability, and major challenges. By integrating recent pilot data and providing a critical assessment, this review offers a roadmap for future research in direct seawater CO2 capture. The comparative analysis reveals that electrochemical methods achieve the highest efficiency (60–85%) but face membrane fouling and electrode degradation challenges, while biological methods offer low-energy operation but suffer from slow kinetics and high harvesting costs, and membrane-based methods provide high removal rates (up to 94%) but require improved fouling resistance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2026-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19091763
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Review of Biological, Electrochemical, and Membrane-Based Methods for Direct Ocean Carbon Capture

Jiayu Zheng, Gang Kevin Li, Siyuan Guo, Yi Yang et al.
Materials
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
article

A Comparative Review of Biological, Electrochemical, and Membrane-Based Methods for Direct Ocean Carbon Capture

Jiayu Zheng, Gang Kevin Li, Siyuan Guo, Yi Yang, Zi Wang, Shupeng Li, Ting Zhang, Hang Cao
article en

Abstract

Direct ocean carbon capture (DOC) has emerged as a promising strategy for mitigating atmospheric CO2 levels and addressing ocean acidification. Unlike direct air carbon capture methods, DOC leverages the ocean’s vast carbon storage capacity, offering a scalable and efficient route for carbon dioxide removal. This systematic comparative review categorizes existing DOC methods into three types: (1) biological carbon capture, which relies on photosynthesis by microalgae and marine microorganisms; (2) electrochemical carbon capture, which utilizes water electrolysis to generate H+ and OH− ions for pH-driven CO2 removal; and (3) physical carbon capture, which employs hollow fiber membranes to directly separate CO2 from seawater. For each technology, we evaluate efficiency, energy consumption, cost, technology readiness level (TRL), scalability, and major challenges. By integrating recent pilot data and providing a critical assessment, this review offers a roadmap for future research in direct seawater CO2 capture. The comparative analysis reveals that electrochemical methods achieve the highest efficiency (60–85%) but face membrane fouling and electrode degradation challenges, while biological methods offer low-energy operation but suffer from slow kinetics and high harvesting costs, and membrane-based methods provide high removal rates (up to 94%) but require improved fouling resistance.

MaterialsVol. 19(9)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Guangdong Ocean University (CN), Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN), Northeastern University (CN)
Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.