The impact of government land regulation on carbon emission intensity: mechanism and transmission path from a corporate environmental strategy perspective

Introduction Achieving China’s dual-carbon goals requires clearer evidence on how government land regulation affects citylevel carbon emission intensity and through which mechanisms this effect operates. Methods Using an unbalanced panel of 230 prefecture-level cities in China from 2006 to 2022 (N = 3,566), this study examines land supply regulation, land use purpose regulation, and land use intensity regulation. Land supply regulation is estimated with a correlated random effects (Mundlak CRE) model, while land use purpose regulation and land use intensity regulation are estimated with twoway fixed effects and Driscoll-Kraay standard errors. Mediation tests, moderation tests, regional heterogeneity analysis, system GMM, and robustness checks are also conducted. Results Stronger land supply regulation is associated with lower carbon emission intensity (beta = −50.153, p = 0.058), land use intensity regulation significantly reduces carbon emission intensity (beta = -0.026, p < 0.001), and greater land-use concentration increases carbon emission intensity (beta = 0.181, p = 0.016). Four of six a-paths from land regulation to corporate green behavior are significant, but all bpaths are insignificant after controlling for land regulation, so no detectable mediation effect is supported. Industrial structure upgrading significantly moderates five of six pathways from land regulation to corporate environmental strategy, and regional heterogeneity is also observed. Discussion Government land regulation affects urban carbon outcomes primarily through broader structural channels rather than a simple listed-firm mediation pathway. The findings support differentiated and region-specific land regulation portfolios and closer alignment between land policy and industrial structure upgrading.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2026.1744368
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of government land regulation on carbon emission intensity: mechanism and transmission path from a corporate environmental strategy perspective

Jincheng Lan
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

The impact of government land regulation on carbon emission intensity: mechanism and transmission path from a corporate environmental strategy perspective

Jincheng Lan
article en

Abstract

Introduction Achieving China’s dual-carbon goals requires clearer evidence on how government land regulation affects citylevel carbon emission intensity and through which mechanisms this effect operates. Methods Using an unbalanced panel of 230 prefecture-level cities in China from 2006 to 2022 (N = 3,566), this study examines land supply regulation, land use purpose regulation, and land use intensity regulation. Land supply regulation is estimated with a correlated random effects (Mundlak CRE) model, while land use purpose regulation and land use intensity regulation are estimated with twoway fixed effects and Driscoll-Kraay standard errors. Mediation tests, moderation tests, regional heterogeneity analysis, system GMM, and robustness checks are also conducted. Results Stronger land supply regulation is associated with lower carbon emission intensity (beta = −50.153, p = 0.058), land use intensity regulation significantly reduces carbon emission intensity (beta = -0.026, p < 0.001), and greater land-use concentration increases carbon emission intensity (beta = 0.181, p = 0.016). Four of six a-paths from land regulation to corporate green behavior are significant, but all bpaths are insignificant after controlling for land regulation, so no detectable mediation effect is supported. Industrial structure upgrading significantly moderates five of six pathways from land regulation to corporate environmental strategy, and regional heterogeneity is also observed. Discussion Government land regulation affects urban carbon outcomes primarily through broader structural channels rather than a simple listed-firm mediation pathway. The findings support differentiated and region-specific land regulation portfolios and closer alignment between land policy and industrial structure upgrading.

Frontiers in Environmental ScienceVol. 14
Capital University of Economics and Business (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.