Stacking types and quantitative gas-trapping evaluation of coalbed methane cap rocks in the Shanxi Coalfield

The gas-trapping mechanisms of coalbed methane (CBM) cap rocks in the Shanxi Coalfield remain unclear, and single-lithology assessment methods have inherent limitations. Based on 273 datasets from 125 coal mines, this study classifies cap rock stacking types and quantitatively evaluates their gas-trapping capacity using Markov chain analysis, analytic hierarchy process (AHP), and COMSOL numerical simulation. Cap rocks are classified into 3 major types and 8 sub-types, including composite (28%), thick (58%), and coal cap rocks (14%). The dominant types (I, V, VIII) display distinct gas pressure evolution characteristics, with Type VIII showing a unique “decrease–increase–decrease” trend. A lithology-weighted and distance-attenuated equivalent thickness coefficient model is established, yielding the following sealing capacity ranking: Type VIII (1.1908) > Type V (1.1506) > Type I (0.6664). Gas-trapping capacity is hierarchically controlled: lithology dominates within 0–5 m, while the equivalent thickness coefficient prevails at 5–10 m. The effective sealing zone is within 10 m above the coal seam. These results provide theoretical support for efficient CBM development and CO₂ geological sequestration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-50308-5
Primary Topic
Coal Properties and Utilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stacking types and quantitative gas-trapping evaluation of coalbed methane cap rocks in the Shanxi Coalfield

Xiaoli Wang, Tianhe Kang, Liya Yu, Ning Jiang et al.
Scientific Reports
Coal Properties and Utilization
article

Stacking types and quantitative gas-trapping evaluation of coalbed methane cap rocks in the Shanxi Coalfield

Xiaoli Wang, Tianhe Kang, Liya Yu, Ning Jiang, Guofei Zhao
article en

Abstract

The gas-trapping mechanisms of coalbed methane (CBM) cap rocks in the Shanxi Coalfield remain unclear, and single-lithology assessment methods have inherent limitations. Based on 273 datasets from 125 coal mines, this study classifies cap rock stacking types and quantitatively evaluates their gas-trapping capacity using Markov chain analysis, analytic hierarchy process (AHP), and COMSOL numerical simulation. Cap rocks are classified into 3 major types and 8 sub-types, including composite (28%), thick (58%), and coal cap rocks (14%). The dominant types (I, V, VIII) display distinct gas pressure evolution characteristics, with Type VIII showing a unique “decrease–increase–decrease” trend. A lithology-weighted and distance-attenuated equivalent thickness coefficient model is established, yielding the following sealing capacity ranking: Type VIII (1.1908) > Type V (1.1506) > Type I (0.6664). Gas-trapping capacity is hierarchically controlled: lithology dominates within 0–5 m, while the equivalent thickness coefficient prevails at 5–10 m. The effective sealing zone is within 10 m above the coal seam. These results provide theoretical support for efficient CBM development and CO₂ geological sequestration.

Scientific Reports
Changzhi University (CN), Jinzhong University (CN), Taiyuan University of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Coal Properties and Utilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Stacking types and quantitative gas-trapping evaluation of coalbed methane cap rocks in the Shanxi Coalfield — Xiaoli Wang, Tianhe Kang, et al. · Scientific Reports (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS