Coordination Without Command: Active Inference and the Route to Embodied Intelligence

Embodied intelligence is often discussed in robotics in terms of control, planning, or optimi- sation; yet real agents must act through bodies that are dynamically constrained, only partially informed and continuously reshaped by their own movements. In this perspective, we argue that embodied intelligence is better understood not as the operation of a single central con- troller, but as the coordination of distributed, hierarchical and plural inferential processes. We develop this argument by first examining why embodiment places pressure on monolithic con- trol architectures, then showing why active inference provides a particularly natural framework for agents that must act under uncertainty while sampling the world through movement. We ground the discussion in two complementary examples: the octopus as a biological instance of intelligence distributed through the body and a temporally predictive scene-based drone con- troller as a computational case study in embodied active inference under partial observability. Taken together, these examples suggest that robust embodied behaviour may depend less on exhaustive central resolution than on coordination without command across multiple timescales, interfaces, and inferential demands.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19847521
Primary Topic
Embodied and Extended Cognition
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Coordination Without Command: Active Inference and the Route to Embodied Intelligence

Alexander Shaw
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Embodied and Extended Cognition
preprint

Coordination Without Command: Active Inference and the Route to Embodied Intelligence

Alexander Shaw
preprint en

Abstract

Embodied intelligence is often discussed in robotics in terms of control, planning, or optimi- sation; yet real agents must act through bodies that are dynamically constrained, only partially informed and continuously reshaped by their own movements. In this perspective, we argue that embodied intelligence is better understood not as the operation of a single central con- troller, but as the coordination of distributed, hierarchical and plural inferential processes. We develop this argument by first examining why embodiment places pressure on monolithic con- trol architectures, then showing why active inference provides a particularly natural framework for agents that must act under uncertainty while sampling the world through movement. We ground the discussion in two complementary examples: the octopus as a biological instance of intelligence distributed through the body and a temporally predictive scene-based drone con- troller as a computational case study in embodied active inference under partial observability. Taken together, these examples suggest that robust embodied behaviour may depend less on exhaustive central resolution than on coordination without command across multiple timescales, interfaces, and inferential demands.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Exeter (GB), Cardiff University (GB)
Embodied and Extended Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.