External validation of a machine learning model for delivery mode prediction after induction

No machine learning (ML) models for predicting delivery mode after labor induction (IOL) have been externally validated. We aimed to develop and validate one using medical records. Portuguese tertiary center data (n = 2434) were used for development and internal validation, and Consortium on Safe Labor data (n = 10,591) for external validation. Outcomes are vaginal delivery (VD) or cesarean section (CS). Internal validation employed different ML approaches, aiming for model simplification. Logistic regression performed best on internal validation: AUROC:0.793; F1-score:0.748; PPV:0.752, with good calibration and decision curve analysis (DCA), being selected for simplification. Simplified top-13 features model was selected for external validation: AUROC:0.808; F1-score:0.781; PPV:0.822, tending for VD (99.6%) while avoiding false-positives (0.5%). Calibration curves underestimated CS risk by 10-75%; DCA showed good net benefit. The model's good AUROC and DCA suggest clinical utility. Calibration curve underestimation of CS risk may result from outcome imbalance between datasets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02384-0
Primary Topic
Vehicle Noise and Vibration Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

External validation of a machine learning model for delivery mode prediction after induction

Ana Luísa Areia, João Correia, Iolanda Ferreira, Joana Simoes
npj Digital Medicine
Vehicle Noise and Vibration Control
article

External validation of a machine learning model for delivery mode prediction after induction

Ana Luísa Areia, João Correia, Iolanda Ferreira, Joana Simoes
article en

Abstract

No machine learning (ML) models for predicting delivery mode after labor induction (IOL) have been externally validated. We aimed to develop and validate one using medical records. Portuguese tertiary center data (n = 2434) were used for development and internal validation, and Consortium on Safe Labor data (n = 10,591) for external validation. Outcomes are vaginal delivery (VD) or cesarean section (CS). Internal validation employed different ML approaches, aiming for model simplification. Logistic regression performed best on internal validation: AUROC:0.793; F1-score:0.748; PPV:0.752, with good calibration and decision curve analysis (DCA), being selected for simplification. Simplified top-13 features model was selected for external validation: AUROC:0.808; F1-score:0.781; PPV:0.822, tending for VD (99.6%) while avoiding false-positives (0.5%). Calibration curves underestimated CS risk by 10-75%; DCA showed good net benefit. The model's good AUROC and DCA suggest clinical utility. Calibration curve underestimation of CS risk may result from outcome imbalance between datasets.

npj Digital Medicine
Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Coimbra (PT), University of Coimbra (PT)
Intermountain Healthcare, University of Miami, Georgetown University, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, National Institutes of Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Vehicle Noise and Vibration Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.