How to design a ROCI (Response Over Continuous Intervention) randomised trial: guidance and a case study

An important challenge in late-phase drug development is selection of the optimal parameters for treatment administration, including dose, duration and frequency. Whilst these are (near-)continuous parameters, conventional non-inferiority trial designs are not well suited to explore multiple options across a range of values. The ROCI (Response Over Continuous Intervention) randomised trial design is an alternative to standard non-inferiority trials, addressing limitations in selecting optimal treatment regimens, but practical guidance in its application is limited. We outline key design considerations for ROCI trials, including modelling the treatment–response relationship, selecting treatment levels and arms, defining optimality criteria, and determining power and sample size. A flexible fractional polynomial approach is recommended to estimate the treatment–response relationship, and two power definitions—optimal and acceptable—are considered. We apply these principles to REFINE-Lung, which investigates whether extended pembrolizumab dosing intervals in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) maintain efficacy while reducing unnecessary overtreatment. Sample size calculations use simulation-based methods or an analytic formula for binary outcomes. REFINE-Lung was designed with five administration frequency arms, exploring the range within which the optimal frequency is likely to exist (6-, 9-, 12-, 15-, and 18-weekly dosing), with the primary endpoint 2-year overall survival. Initial sample size calculations targeted 1,750 patients to provide 80% optimal power, but in order to accelerate completion this was adjusted to 1,100 patients targeting acceptable power. An interim analysis strategy allowed adaptation based on early data on progression-free survival. This approach balances statistical robustness with feasibility while ensuring ethical equipoise in dose de-escalation. The ROCI design is an efficient alternative to standard non-inferiority trials for optimising continuous aspects of treatment administration. By sharing information across multiple treatment levels and leveraging flexible modelling approaches, ROCI trials improve efficiency and reliability in identifying optimal treatment regimens. The REFINE-Lung trial case study demonstrates applying these principles, providing a framework for future trials aiming to refine treatment administration strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Published
2026-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-026-02786-4
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to design a ROCI (Response Over Continuous Intervention) randomised trial: guidance and a case study

Matteo Quartagno, Ehsan Ghorani, Henry Bern, Michael J. Seckl et al.
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

How to design a ROCI (Response Over Continuous Intervention) randomised trial: guidance and a case study

Matteo Quartagno, Ehsan Ghorani, Henry Bern, Michael J. Seckl, Koen B. Pouwels, Michelle Clements, James R. Carpenter, Mahesh KB Parmar, Ian W. White, A. Sarah Walker, Tim P. Morris
article en

Abstract

An important challenge in late-phase drug development is selection of the optimal parameters for treatment administration, including dose, duration and frequency. Whilst these are (near-)continuous parameters, conventional non-inferiority trial designs are not well suited to explore multiple options across a range of values. The ROCI (Response Over Continuous Intervention) randomised trial design is an alternative to standard non-inferiority trials, addressing limitations in selecting optimal treatment regimens, but practical guidance in its application is limited. We outline key design considerations for ROCI trials, including modelling the treatment–response relationship, selecting treatment levels and arms, defining optimality criteria, and determining power and sample size. A flexible fractional polynomial approach is recommended to estimate the treatment–response relationship, and two power definitions—optimal and acceptable—are considered. We apply these principles to REFINE-Lung, which investigates whether extended pembrolizumab dosing intervals in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) maintain efficacy while reducing unnecessary overtreatment. Sample size calculations use simulation-based methods or an analytic formula for binary outcomes. REFINE-Lung was designed with five administration frequency arms, exploring the range within which the optimal frequency is likely to exist (6-, 9-, 12-, 15-, and 18-weekly dosing), with the primary endpoint 2-year overall survival. Initial sample size calculations targeted 1,750 patients to provide 80% optimal power, but in order to accelerate completion this was adjusted to 1,100 patients targeting acceptable power. An interim analysis strategy allowed adaptation based on early data on progression-free survival. This approach balances statistical robustness with feasibility while ensuring ethical equipoise in dose de-escalation. The ROCI design is an efficient alternative to standard non-inferiority trials for optimising continuous aspects of treatment administration. By sharing information across multiple treatment levels and leveraging flexible modelling approaches, ROCI trials improve efficiency and reliability in identifying optimal treatment regimens. The REFINE-Lung trial case study demonstrates applying these principles, providing a framework for future trials aiming to refine treatment administration strategies.

BMC Medical Research Methodology
Charing Cross Hospital (GB), University of Oxford (GB), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL (GB), University College London (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Medical Research Council
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.