Broca’s biases in modern aphasiology

Broca’s description of aphemia signals the emergence of aphasiology as a discipline. It also marks the beginning of a long tradition of studies of right-handed patients (“Nous parlons avec l’hémisphère gauche”) with lesions in the inferior frontal gyrus (Broca’s area) displaying production deficits (Broca’s aphasia) in their single, mainly Romance or, as years went by, Germanic language. In modern-day aphasiology, language crosses hemispheric boundaries, production is no longer confined to the left inferior frontal gyrus, and lesions in Broca’s area do not necessarily entail Broca’s aphasia, with recognized production deficits associated with other lesion locations and aphasia types. Nonetheless, idealized monolingual speakers are still at the center of most theories and shape the design of clinical materials. In this paper, we address two key questions Broca left unanswered: (1) How well do current linguistic theories accommodate the diversity of typologies in the nearly 7,000 languages of the world? and (2) How adequate are our clinical resources for the assessment and treatment needs of multilingual individuals? After an introduction, we will discuss crosslinguistic contributions to the development of modern aphasiology in section 2. Section 3 will focus on multilingual aphasia studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2026.1783073
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Broca’s biases in modern aphasiology

M Norvik, Silvia Martínez-Ferreiro
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
article

Broca’s biases in modern aphasiology

M Norvik, Silvia Martínez-Ferreiro
article en

Abstract

Broca’s description of aphemia signals the emergence of aphasiology as a discipline. It also marks the beginning of a long tradition of studies of right-handed patients (“Nous parlons avec l’hémisphère gauche”) with lesions in the inferior frontal gyrus (Broca’s area) displaying production deficits (Broca’s aphasia) in their single, mainly Romance or, as years went by, Germanic language. In modern-day aphasiology, language crosses hemispheric boundaries, production is no longer confined to the left inferior frontal gyrus, and lesions in Broca’s area do not necessarily entail Broca’s aphasia, with recognized production deficits associated with other lesion locations and aphasia types. Nonetheless, idealized monolingual speakers are still at the center of most theories and shape the design of clinical materials. In this paper, we address two key questions Broca left unanswered: (1) How well do current linguistic theories accommodate the diversity of typologies in the nearly 7,000 languages of the world? and (2) How adequate are our clinical resources for the assessment and treatment needs of multilingual individuals? After an introduction, we will discuss crosslinguistic contributions to the development of modern aphasiology in section 2. Section 3 will focus on multilingual aphasia studies.

Frontiers in Human NeuroscienceVol. 20
University of Oslo (NO), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (ES), UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.