Measuring Successful Cooperation in Human-AI Teamwork: Development and Validation of the Perceived Cooperativity and Teaming Perception Scales

As human–AI cooperation becomes increasingly prevalent, reliable instruments for assessing the subjective quality of cooperative human–AI interaction are needed. We introduce two theoretically grounded scales: the Perceived Cooperativity Scale (PCS), grounded in joint activity theory, and the Teaming Perception Scale (TPS), grounded in evolutionary cooperation theory. The PCS captures an agent’s perceived cooperative capability and practice within a single interaction sequence; the TPS captures the emergent sense of teaming arising from mutual contribution and support. Both scales were adapted for human–human cooperation to enable cross-agent comparisons. Across three studies (complete N=409) encompassing a cooperative card game (N1=94), LLM interaction (N2=182), and a decision-support system (N3=133), analyses of dimensionality, reliability, and validity indicated that both scales successfully differentiated between cooperation partners of varying cooperative quality and showed construct validity in line with expectations. The scales provide a basis for empirical investigation and system evaluation across a wide range of human–AI cooperation contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2026.2739657
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring Successful Cooperation in Human-AI Teamwork: Development and Validation of the Perceived Cooperativity and Teaming Perception Scales

Patricia Wollstadt, Mourad Zoubir, Christiane B. Wiebel-Herboth, Tim Schrills et al.
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Measuring Successful Cooperation in Human-AI Teamwork: Development and Validation of the Perceived Cooperativity and Teaming Perception Scales

Patricia Wollstadt, Mourad Zoubir, Christiane B. Wiebel-Herboth, Tim Schrills, Christiane Attig, Thomas Franke
article en

Abstract

As human–AI cooperation becomes increasingly prevalent, reliable instruments for assessing the subjective quality of cooperative human–AI interaction are needed. We introduce two theoretically grounded scales: the Perceived Cooperativity Scale (PCS), grounded in joint activity theory, and the Teaming Perception Scale (TPS), grounded in evolutionary cooperation theory. The PCS captures an agent’s perceived cooperative capability and practice within a single interaction sequence; the TPS captures the emergent sense of teaming arising from mutual contribution and support. Both scales were adapted for human–human cooperation to enable cross-agent comparisons. Across three studies (complete N=409) encompassing a cooperative card game (N1=94), LLM interaction (N2=182), and a decision-support system (N3=133), analyses of dimensionality, reliability, and validity indicated that both scales successfully differentiated between cooperation partners of varying cooperative quality and showed construct validity in line with expectations. The scales provide a basis for empirical investigation and system evaluation across a wide range of human–AI cooperation contexts.

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
Honda (Germany) (DE), University of Lübeck (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.