Techniques in Science Advice: Modelling for Policy and the Politics of Models

Computational models have become indispensable in policy-making across many domains, from environmental regulation, to trade policies and public health. Yet their role as techniques in science advice remains underexplored. This article discusses models through three interrelated analytical dimensions: as boundary objects coordinating different social spheres; as sites where authority is enacted, negotiated, and contested; and as performative devices that actively constitute policy realities. Drawing on social science scholarship and empirical cases, the article demonstrates how models entangle epistemic, technical, social, and political dimensions within advisory assemblages. It concludes with a discussion of responsible modelling, emphasizing inclusion, transparency, and communication.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Università degli Studi di Trento
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15168/2284-4503-4026
Primary Topic
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Techniques in Science Advice: Modelling for Policy and the Politics of Models

Anja Bauer
Università degli Studi di Trento
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
article

Techniques in Science Advice: Modelling for Policy and the Politics of Models

Anja Bauer
article en

Abstract

Computational models have become indispensable in policy-making across many domains, from environmental regulation, to trade policies and public health. Yet their role as techniques in science advice remains underexplored. This article discusses models through three interrelated analytical dimensions: as boundary objects coordinating different social spheres; as sites where authority is enacted, negotiated, and contested; and as performative devices that actively constitute policy realities. Drawing on social science scholarship and empirical cases, the article demonstrates how models entangle epistemic, technical, social, and political dimensions within advisory assemblages. It concludes with a discussion of responsible modelling, emphasizing inclusion, transparency, and communication.

Università degli Studi di Trento
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.