Assessing Digital Interactional Competence for Second‐Language and First‐Language Chinese Speakers: Effects of Proficiency, Mode, and Setting

Abstract Measurement of interactional competence (IC) has attracted increasing interest in language assessment research. One key question is whether proficiency sufficiently accounts for IC, making separate IC assessment unnecessary. This study examines the IC–proficiency relationship using a test that assesses Chinese speakers’ ability to manage multiplex social roles in digital communication. A total of 103 second‐language (L2) and first‐language (L1) Chinese speakers completed a nine‐item roleplay IC test on a smartphone application. Using linguistic laypersons’ indigenous criteria, we observed a disconnect between proficiency and IC through quantitative and qualitative analyses. Findings also indicate that IC is not stable across social settings, roles, and digital modes, with L1 speakers showing greater disparity in IC performance than L2 speakers. We discuss implications for the assessment and teaching of IC in digital communication with rich social, cultural, and relational cues. We also suggest ways forward in reconceptualizing IC in the artificial intelligence (AI) era.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Language Learning
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.70032
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Digital Interactional Competence for Second‐Language and First‐Language Chinese Speakers: Effects of Proficiency, Mode, and Setting

David Wei Dai, Carsten Roever
Language Learning
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

Assessing Digital Interactional Competence for Second‐Language and First‐Language Chinese Speakers: Effects of Proficiency, Mode, and Setting

David Wei Dai, Carsten Roever
article en

Abstract

Abstract Measurement of interactional competence (IC) has attracted increasing interest in language assessment research. One key question is whether proficiency sufficiently accounts for IC, making separate IC assessment unnecessary. This study examines the IC–proficiency relationship using a test that assesses Chinese speakers’ ability to manage multiplex social roles in digital communication. A total of 103 second‐language (L2) and first‐language (L1) Chinese speakers completed a nine‐item roleplay IC test on a smartphone application. Using linguistic laypersons’ indigenous criteria, we observed a disconnect between proficiency and IC through quantitative and qualitative analyses. Findings also indicate that IC is not stable across social settings, roles, and digital modes, with L1 speakers showing greater disparity in IC performance than L2 speakers. We discuss implications for the assessment and teaching of IC in digital communication with rich social, cultural, and relational cues. We also suggest ways forward in reconceptualizing IC in the artificial intelligence (AI) era.

Language Learning
The University of Melbourne (AU), University College London (GB)
British Academy, University College London
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.